[et_pb_section admin_label=”section”]
[et_pb_row admin_label=”row”]
[et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text”]
Easton Stick was an early signing for the Chargers’ 2024 free agency, putting pen to paper with the Bolts only three days after the March 13th start of the new league year. It was a curious move for fans; Stick had four games of starting opportunity to display his five years of NFL development, and was an overwhelming disappointment on an underachieving and injury-plagued squad. After an historic Ironman streak by Philip Rivers bridging three seasons of consistent Justin Herbert starts to Drew Brees’ final seasons as the Chargers starter, the fanbase hadn’t witnessed a backup quarterback leading their offense to multiple starts since Doug Flutie in 2003. When Stick helmed the offense to a storied loss against the Raiders, he looked bewildered and overwhelmed throughout the course of the game. In the three losses that followed, he may not have looked as terrible, but he did nothing to instill confidence in his ability to play at the NFL level.
When Joe Hortiz and Jim Harbaugh brough Stick back, one glimmer of hope remained for the beleaguered signal caller. Greg Roman had worked some wonders with quarterbacks of similar skill sets in his past, even resurrecting some careers. Whatever Easton Stick’s ceiling was, Roman’s system that had groomed multiple dual-threat quarterbacks leaning athlete-first, quarterback second was sure to get Easton there.
In one preseason game, any hope of Easton Stick taking a leap evaporated before you could answer, “Who’s got it better than us?!”
The Chargers are currently sitting on approximately $20 million of cap space, $12-13 million of which is free to spend while leaving a responsible budget behind for the practice squad and injury replacements. That should be more than enough to get Ryan Tannehill on the squad to fill in should Justin Herbert miss any games, whether Justin needs the first few weeks of the season to rest, or the team decides they need insurance should Justin end up hampered by this foot injury later in the year. On paper, Ryan Tannehill looks like a no-brainer addition to this squad.
But what if there was a player that has won in Greg Roman’s scheme, has playoff experience, is electric to watch, and is very likely available?
Tyler Huntley isn’t a perfect quarterback, but while playing in Greg Roman’s system, he is 3-4, and 0-1 in the playoffs. He does a yeoman’s job of keeping his team competitive by extending plays with his legs, and does a decent job at avoiding turnovers. The Ravens were 8-5 when Huntley took over for an injured Lamar Jackson in 2022, but he did just enough to get Baltimore to the playoffs by going 2-2 down the stretch before losing to the Bengals 16-27 in the Wild Card round. He even earned Pro Bowl honors as an injury replacement – a bid that was controversial given his four total starts on the season.
Huntley was seen as a potential breakout player potentially fighting for a starting gig after his 2022 performance, but he returned to the Ravens in 2023 as Lamar Jacksons backup for another season. His stats as a whole in 2023 look impressive, with a 99.3 QBR, but he was brought in to spell Lamar when the Ravens blew a game open and when Baltimore rested their starts against the Steelers in Week 18 after having already clinched the #1 seed.
Seeing Huntley sign with the Cleveland Browns in the 2024 offseason was curious, as the path to playing time is questionable. Deshaun Watson is entrenched as a heavily paid starter, Jameis Winston is a very serviceable backup, and Dorian Thompson-Robinson was drafted only a year ago and has shown flashes of ability. Huntley is currently a cut candidate in nearly every Browns publication you can find.
The situation in Cleveland looks to be an opportunity for the Chargers. With Huntley’s familiarity with Greg Roman’s scheme, could they decide to wait until the final-53 cuts and grab Huntley off waivers when the Browns likely try to sneak him to their practice squad, or could the Chargers try to entice the Browns with a pick swap to get Huntley in early and let him start building chemistry with the receivers while Herbert continues his recovery? It shouldn’t cost much – perhaps a 6th for their 7th, or a 7th for Huntley straight-up… either way, it’s a trade worth exploring.
An exciting brand of football? Check.
Athletic upside? Check.
Scheme familiarity and success? Check.
This looks like a no-brainer that would be a no-lose situation for Chargers fans. After all, it can’t be worse than what happened Saturday… or the last time they faced the Raiders.
This is a good read Kyle. I was thinking Tannehill would make us feel a lot more confident with a veteran who’s been a starter and at times played at a high level when he had the talent around him. However, Huntley would make more since with how the Chargers are retooling with these one year prove it deals and with players that’s played on Greg Romans offense. The signing of Huntley at this point makes more since than bringing in Tannehill as a backup that will cost more than their probably willing to spend.
Good article Kyle – great to see the content coming from you.
That said… I do not get the hate for Stick. Do I think Easton is an elite backup QB? Absolutely not. Is he an average backup QB playing for a below-average salary. While every Charger QB, including Stick, sucked against the Seahawks. Consider Easton’s play in 2023:
- Stick played behind a injured, below-average OL
- The 2023 Chargers could not run the ball.
- WR1 – WR3 were out for the majority of snaps Stick played
- In spite of all this, Stick’s PFF (66.8) was better than any QB on the Raiders roster (Minshew: 62.0, O’Connell: 65.9)
- Stick completed 63.8% of his passes for 1,129 yards, 3 TDs and only 1 INT. He also rushed for 144 yards (5.3 yards per attempt)
- Stick’s mobility is much more suited for a Roman offense
Easton had a bad game. The entire offense had a bad game. Do I think Easton’s showing in the first pre-season game of 2024 is more representative of his abilities than the 5 actual NFL games he played in 2023? Absolutely not.
Greg Roman’s offense is a much better fit for a mobile QB like Stick. I think the 2024 Chargers can win games with Easton. That said, I also think that Hundley is an interesting option. I would welcome signing him & letting him compete with Stick for the backup role.
From yesterday 8/14/24 practice:
• Stick did not convert a third down in eight attempts during the third-down-focused 11-on-11 period.
I’m fine with it if the Browns cut him. I’d be hesitant to save a season if Herbert goes down, especially while we’re in rebuild mode.
We’re ostensibly in the same spot next year when it comes to holes on the roster, so from that perspective I’d rather have a bevy of cost controlled rookies than merc-ing our whole roster and praying we can replicate 20 years of developmental success that Hortiz is accustomed to.
Popper thinks Stick has regressed too.
If we didn’t know before that Max Duggan was not the QB “hiding in plain sight”, we definitely know now. The Chargers are cutting him today. Bummer for both parties that he was not a good draft pick and that he is most likely working his way out of the league. It is not an easy position to play.
He had nothing close to the arm talent needed at the NFL level. Waste of draft capital.
Max Duggan cut. A few thoughts:
- This was a frustratingly obvious blown pick. Rice or C Johnson may not make the team, but they can play and have a shot at contributing. Duggan does not have an NFL arm. He was never going to contribute to this team
- Perez is 29, a year older than Stick. Pretty clear that he’s going to be the PS QB, at least to start the season. Don’t see Luis being a developmental guy due to his age.
- I would not be shocked to see the Chargers sign a QB based on who’s cut. Maybe the current 3 players are with the team to start, but maybe only Herbert is with the team in October.
This is a VERY homer take of mine- but if the reasoning behind drafting Duggan was that it could maximize QJ’s growth, I’d have no qualms. Investing a 7th in your 1sts development is a pretty dang good investment, only doubled down by the fact you also drafted another one of the 7th’s WR’s in the 4th.
That said – it clearly didn’t pan out.
[/et_pb_row]
[/et_pb_section]



