Beyond Cap Space · Part 5

Hortiz’s 2026 Offseason
Direction Is Set

Within five hours of the negotiating window opening, Joe Hortiz’s offseason blueprint came into focus.

The Appetizer Before the Meal

Before the legal tampering window even opened, the Chargers’ offseason course was already being put into motion. Three signings, spread across the week leading up to the negotiating period, didn’t finish the picture, but they framed it. They were the appetizer to what was coming, and by the time the window actually opened, we could already see where this thing was headed.

Each signing addressed a different priority. Each one constrained the next decision. And taken together, they told us which offseason Joe Hortiz was choosing to run: aggressive where the value existed, disciplined where the market was going to overheat, and protective of the draft capital ledger at every step.

Here’s the sequence.

01
Tyler Biadasz
3 years · $30M · $10M AAV
The first domino, and the one that told us the most. Hortiz led the center frenzy, securing the former Washington starter before most teams had finished their opening calls. Pundits raved about the value. We covered this signing in depth in Part 3.5 of this series, and everything written there holds. But the signal here wasn’t just about Biadasz. It was a teaser that Hortiz wasn’t going to be hyper-aggressive with cash or disregard the comp pick ledger by chasing Tyler Linderbaum at the top of the market. He found the tier below the top, and he locked it in before anyone else could react.
02
Alec Ingold
2 years · $7.5M · $3.9M Year 1 cash
Signed over the weekend. He immediately becomes the most talented fullback the Chargers have had since Lorenzo Neal, and a centerpiece of McDaniel’s offense at an extremely modest price. Miami released him just two days before the signing, and the reason matters: he was cut because McDaniel left, not because of performance. He’s the most scheme-native player available for McDaniel’s system at any position. We covered this in Part 4.1. This was a widely predicted signing at a price low enough that it should’ve happened no matter what cap or cash path the Chargers took. The coaching staff knows him. The scouting process was a phone call.
03
Khalil Mack
1 year · $18M (fully guaranteed) · $10M signing bonus
Re-signed before the window even opened. The Chargers shored up the immediate EDGE need by bringing back the most respected player in the building, and this gives Los Angeles a distinction worth noting: Mack has now been a Charger for five seasons, surpassing both Oakland and Chicago (four each) to make this his longest tenure with any franchise. He’s a locker room pillar, a player whose presence carries weight beyond any pass rush grade, and a critical bridge while the organization develops younger edge talent. But the timing matters just as much as the player. With Mack locked in early, there was less pressure to overpay to keep Odafe Oweh in-house, giving Hortiz further flexibility to let Oweh walk and collect a compensatory pick if the market pushed beyond his range.

The contextual dominoes fell almost simultaneously. Soon after Biadasz signed last week, the Patriots traded Garrett Bradbury to the Bears, and the Bills re-signed Connor McGovern. The center market moved fast, validating Hortiz’s early strike. Wait another hour, and the best options at the position were either off the board or commanding significantly more money.

Three signings. Three different price tiers. Three different positional needs addressed. And the most important part of each one wasn’t the player acquired. It was what the signing preserved for the decisions still ahead.

The Big One

When this series began, we posed a question: sign Tyler Linderbaum at the top of the center market, or find value elsewhere and deploy the savings across the rest of the roster? Hortiz answered that question before the window opened. The rest of the league answered it within hours.

The Raiders signed Tyler Linderbaum to a 3-year, $81M deal. $27M AAV. $60M guaranteed.

That’s $9 million per year more than any center in NFL history. Creed Humphrey held the record at $18M AAV. Linderbaum didn’t just break the market. He obliterated it. The gap between the old record and the new one is larger than what most starting centers make in total.

Market Context

Hortiz negotiated one of the last center signings before Linderbaum completely changed how the position is valued. Not only is Linderbaum’s APY a 50% raise over Creed Humphrey’s deal, but he jumped Humphrey’s 7.05% market share to 8.97%, a 27% raise in year-adjusted value. The Biadasz deal was finalized in the old world. Everything signed after Linderbaum exists in the new one.

This is the validation of the Biadasz signing, viewed through the three-budget lens this series has been building toward since Part 1.

Cap Savings
$17M/Year
Biadasz at $10M AAV vs. Linderbaum at $27M AAV. That $17M annual gap is enough to sign a quality starter at guard, or retain a key player entering free agency.
Cash Savings
Triple the Year 1 Cost
Biadasz’s contract is likely fairly flat at around $10M per year. Linderbaum’s should be somewhat front-loaded, likely $30–35M in Year 1 alone. Triple the year-one cash commitment.
Comp Picks
Protected
Linderbaum as an incoming CFA would have cancelled a projected 3rd-round comp pick. Biadasz was cut by Washington and doesn’t qualify as a CFA, so he’s completely invisible to the comp formula.

The Chargers got a quality starting center at 37% of Linderbaum’s price. Hortiz saw the Linderbaum market developing, recognized the price was going to be absurd, and pivoted to Biadasz at a fraction of the cost. The math was already compelling in Part 3.5 when we only had projections. Now that Linderbaum’s actual number is public, it looks even better.

There will be people who argue the Chargers should have just paid for Linderbaum and lived with the premium. That argument has to account for three simultaneous consequences: $17M more per year on the cap, triple the year-one cash commitment, and a Day 2 comp pick. Hortiz wasn’t choosing between two centers. He was choosing his course for the offseason, and the value proposition across all three resource buckets pointed away from Linderbaum and toward Biadasz.

Zion and Oweh Walk. The Comp Picture Sharpens.

Zion Johnson signed with the Browns for 3 years, $49.5M ($16.5M AAV, $32.4M guaranteed, $17M signing bonus). This confirms what Hortiz telegraphed when he declined the fifth-year option last spring. The Chargers valued Johnson but not at this price. His departure opens a significant hole at left guard, and that hole will need to be addressed through the draft, the trade market, or cut-candidate hunting. But it also generates a compensatory pick, and likely the first time Hortiz pulls in a 4th-rounder as the Chargers’ GM.

Between the Biadasz signing and the Johnson departure, the Chargers also added Charlie Kolar on a 3-year, $24.3M deal ($8.1M AAV, $17M guaranteed). Kolar is the premiere blocking tight end on the market, with improved athleticism over Will Dissly, who was released to make room. Hortiz drafted Kolar in Baltimore, another Ravens pipeline signing that reflects the organizational trust he’s built with players he’s personally evaluated. Kolar becomes the highest-paid blocking tight end in the NFL. Paired with breakout rookie receiving TE Oronde Gadsden, the Chargers now have a balanced tight end room built for exactly what McDaniel’s offense demands, but expect them to still be on the lookout for one more capable addition at the position.

Then the last domino fell.

Odafe Oweh signed with the Commanders for 4 years, $100M ($25M AAV, $68M guaranteed). The price likely became too steep for a player many see as a designated pass rusher, and it’s telling that Jesse Minter and the Ravens just traded two first-round picks for Maxx Crosby instead of reuniting Odafe with the coach that earned him that payday. At $100M, the Chargers were never going to match, not with a Tuli Tuipulotu extension on the horizon and the opportunity cost of him not earning them a 3rd-round compensatory pick. Hortiz had already re-signed Mack as the bridge. Oweh’s departure was the final variable that locked in the remaining strategy.

Later in the day, the Chargers added Cole Strange on a 2-year, $13M deal. Strange cleared waivers last year after being released by New England and spent time on the Browns’ practice squad before Miami picked him up. The price tag suggests the offensive line coaching staff believes they can get more out of him with a full offseason to develop, and the upside is real: Strange was a first-round pick in 2022 with legitimate starting experience. Combined with Trevor Penning, who is staying on a 1-year, $4.5M deal, the Chargers now have two former first-round picks available as guard depth, with over four years of starting experience each. Both signings are low-cost retentions that provide legitimate competition at the interior without meaningfully affecting the comp formula.

The Comp Pick Calculus Locks In

With Oweh’s departure confirmed at $100M, the Chargers’ compensatory pick strategy crystallizes. This is the part of the offseason that most coverage will ignore entirely, and it’s the part that constrains every remaining decision Hortiz makes.

The comp pick formula compares qualifying departing CFAs against qualifying incoming CFAs, matching them by contract value to determine cancellations. Here’s where the Chargers’ ledger stands right now.

Comp Pick Cancellation Chart

→ 2027 DRAFT
Confirmed Projected Cancelled pair ⚡ Earns comp pick
Departing UFAs
Incoming Signings
RDPLAYERAPY
RDPLAYERAPY
3 Odafe Oweh $25M
No cancellation
4 Zion Johnson $16.5M
No cancellation
6 Benjamin St-Juste $7M
6 Charlie Kolar $8.1M
6 Trey Pipkins III $6M
6 Cole Strange $6.5M
7 Jamaree Salyer $4M
No cancellation
7 Keenan Allen $4M
No cancellation
Bubble Players (departing)
Non-CFA Qualifying Numbers (incoming)
Da’Shawn Hand $3M
·
Tyler Biadasz $10M
·
Alec Ingold $3.75M
Net Result: 4 Compensatory Picks Projected — (1) Rd 3, (1) Rd 4, (2) Rd 7 6 departing − 2 cancelled = 4 net · All 4 distributed in 2027
Italicized names are projected — not yet confirmed as departures or signings. Bubble players and Non-CFA qualifying numbers are tracked but do not currently enter the formula. Teams can earn up to 5 compensatory picks, with the highest 4 distributed in the following year’s draft. The cancellation chart pairs the highest-value departure against the highest-value signing; Kolar’s $8.1M APY cancels St-Juste’s projected 6th-round pick, preserving the Oweh (3rd) and Johnson (4th) picks uncancelled.

The rule going forward is clear: expect any CFA signing the Chargers make to stay below roughly $13M APY. That threshold keeps incoming signings out of the 4th-round comp pick cancellation bucket, preserving the Zion Johnson pick. Hortiz is prioritizing the retention of both the Oweh and Johnson comp picks and will focus on cut candidates and CFAs that don’t break into the higher cancellation tiers.

The outgoing CFAs most likely to generate additional comp picks include Benjamin St-Juste, Trey Pipkins, Jamaree Salyer, Keenan Allen, and Da’Shawn Hand. Each additional qualifying departure either sets the budget for how many CFAs Hortiz can sign, or adds to the projected pick count.

With Trevor Penning no longer adding a comp pick to the departing ledger, and Cole Strange adding a cancellation on the incoming side, the Chargers find themselves in an interesting position. It’s assumed Keenan Allen will be retained, which leaves only Jamaree Salyer as potential insulation from additional CFA signings cancelling out the 4th from Zion, and even potentially the 3rd from Odafe. The additional bubble players to watch, in order of importance, are Tony Jefferson, Deane Leonard, Del’Shawn Phillips, Denzel Perryman, and Tyler Conklin. For every one of these players, if they depart (please don’t, TJ!), Chargers fans should hope they manage to secure at least $3.2M APY elsewhere. Each departure above that threshold gives Hortiz another signing he can make without losing his premiere comp picks.

The Chargers are currently positioned for multiple compensatory picks in 2027, with the exact count depending on how many additional CFAs depart versus how many Hortiz signs. The margin is thin. Every incoming CFA above the formula floor carries cancellation risk. That’s the constraint Hortiz is managing for the rest of this window.

Cut Candidates, Trades, and the Lanes That Remain

Here’s the part that makes this offseason genuinely interesting from a strategy perspective. The comp pick math creates specific lanes for Hortiz to operate in, and those lanes favor two acquisition paths over traditional free agency: cut candidates and trades. Both are invisible to the compensatory pick formula. Both allow the Chargers to add starter-level talent without touching the ledger.

Several names have already been released or are rumored as potential cuts by their current teams, and the Chargers have been connected to the cut-candidate market in various reports. Jonnu Smith (TE), Bobby Okereke (LB), and Elgton Jenkins (OG/OT) have already hit the open market after being released. Darnell Mooney (WR), Arik Armstead (DL), and Jonathan Greenard (EDGE) are still rostered but have been floated as potential cuts. Cut candidates and street free agents don’t count against the compensatory pick formula. This is the lane Hortiz is now operating in for any significant additions.

The trade market is the other lane, and possibly the more consequential one. Hortiz is currently working with only five draft picks, and that’s a thin hand for a GM who values volume. Teams have reportedly been calling about Quentin Johnston, and Hortiz displayed clear intention to trade down last year when he negotiated with the Eagles before ultimately running out of time on the clock. It’s interesting that the current trade partner rumor circulating involves the same team from those negotiations.

A scenario where Johnston and the 1st-round pick (#22) get packaged to a team in exchange for an impact starter and multiple later-round picks is at least worth monitoring, even if it’s speculative at this point. Something like A.J. Brown plus a 3rd and 4th in exchange for Johnston and #22 would be the kind of deal to watch for. Trades also eat up cap and cash without affecting the comp pick formula, which is another reason this path makes strategic sense for where the Chargers are positioned right now.

The common thread across both paths: Hortiz can add starting-caliber talent at both guard spots and along the defensive line without cancelling a single compensatory pick. Wide receiver doesn’t have a true hole, but if Quentin Johnston is involved in a trade, it presents an opportunity to upgrade. The lanes exist. The question is whether Hortiz uses them aggressively enough to close the gap between a good roster and a championship one.

The Direction Is Set

⚡ StormCloud Assessment

Aggressive Where Value Existed. Disciplined Where the Market Overheated.

The opening sequence answered the question we posed at the end of Part 3.5: is Hortiz running a deliberate comp pick strategy, or drifting into no man’s land? Based on everything we’ve seen so far, Hortiz is heavily leaning into compensatory pick prioritization.

He was aggressive where the value existed. Biadasz at $10M AAV while Linderbaum went for $27M. Kolar at $8.1M AAV to pair with Gadsden at tight end. Ingold at $3.75M AAV as the most scheme-native player available for McDaniel’s offense. Mack re-signed at $18M because he’s a leader they love and the number was right. Strange at $6.5M AAV as a former first-rounder with upside the coaching staff believes in. Five signings, each one justified by what it preserved as much as what it acquired.

He was disciplined where the market was overheated. Linderbaum at $27M AAV was never going to happen. Oweh at $25M AAV was too steep for a player many view as a designated pass rusher, especially with Tuipulotu’s extension on the horizon. In both cases, Hortiz had a plan for the aftermath before the player signed elsewhere.

And now he’s positioned to operate in the lanes that maximize draft capital: cut candidates who don’t touch the comp formula, potential trades that convert current assets into starters plus additional picks, and balancing his CFA signings by ensuring he doesn’t sign more 5th-through-7th-round bucket players than he has budgeted on the departure side of the ledger.

The roster still has holes. Both guard spots need to be addressed. The defensive line could use another interior presence. Wide receiver presents an upgrade opportunity if the right trade materializes. But the mechanism for addressing those needs is now visible: target cut candidates who don’t affect the formula, work the trade phone, and protect the ledger. Hortiz has five draft picks today. If Johnston’s trade market materializes or Hortiz orchestrates an early trade-down like we discussed in Part 3, he could be looking at six or seven picks by the time April arrives.

The first few hours told the story. What do you think, StormCloud? Did Hortiz thread the needle, or are there gaps in the strategy that the next few weeks need to close?

Data sources: Contract figures verified via NFL.com (Biadasz), Rapoport (Mack), The Insiders (Ingold), Schefter (Linderbaum, Oweh, Johnson, Penning), Pelissero (Kolar). Comp pick projections based on Over the Cap formula modeling. All contract values reflect reported terms at time of signing. Compensatory pick cancellation analysis based on CBA Article 6, Section 7 qualifying CFA definitions. Cut candidates and street free agents do not count as CFAs per the formula.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
25 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
66_Jimbo
66_Jimbo(@66_jimbo)
11 hours ago

Ravens back out of Maxx Crosby deal….

TDU_Alister
TDU_Alister(@alisterlloyd)
11 hours ago

TDU_Alister
TDU_Alister(@alisterlloyd)
11 hours ago

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
13 hours ago

 Kyle DeDiminicantanio Another post in moderation. I wish there was some clue about what triggers this.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
13 hours ago

the Chargers now have two former first-round picks available as guard depth

You seem to be writing that both Strange and Penning can provide guard depth. But they seem to have signed Strange to start at RG unless they acquire another players to compete with him for that position. And the GAC podcast said Penning was brought back exclusively as a tackle and would only play guard in a dire situation.

With no Oweh, I want to say No.22 should be an edge player. But if Ioane is there, maybe not. (He probably won’t be.) If No.22 is an edge player, then No.55 should be a guard to compete with Strange… assuming the other guard slot is solved somehow… but with who? Most of the speculated veteran candidates are gone.

TDU_Alister
TDU_Alister(@alisterlloyd)
Reply to  Tau837
11 hours ago

The veteran guard market is slowly evaporating. Chris Paul, Bitonio, Wyatt Teller are some options.

If they want a guy who was ‘cut’ and so won’t count agaisnt the comp pick formula, the Lions released Graham Glasgow who Harbaugh coached at Michigan. He has experience running in a zone scheme with Ben Johnson, and is versatile:

  • 2,315 snaps at LG
  • 3,536 snaps at C
  • 3,254 snaps at RG.
Arne-sixpakfrombelgium
Arne-sixpakfrombelgium(@arne-sixpakfrombelgium)
13 hours ago

Jenkins 2 years for 24m to the Browns. That feels like a deal the Chargers should have made

66_Jimbo
66_Jimbo(@66_jimbo)
Reply to  Arne-sixpakfrombelgium
13 hours ago

What are they doing!!

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Reply to  66_Jimbo
13 hours ago

Wasting Herbert.

66_Jimbo
66_Jimbo(@66_jimbo)
Reply to  Buck Melanoma
11 hours ago

Are they hoping for some miracle cuts after tomorrow so they can go dumpster diving?…I just don’t get it.

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Reply to  66_Jimbo
3 hours ago

I’m sure all will be explained here to our satisfaction soon. ๏ปฟ ๐Ÿ™„ ๏ปฟ

Erick V
Erick V(@erick-v)
Reply to  66_Jimbo
38 minutes ago

Leaving the roster so bereft at Guard that it telegraphs them to have to select one in the first two rounds of the draft, Telesco style.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
14 hours ago

Ogbonnia to the Cowboys. 1 year/$3M. Don’t think the team was too interested in retaining him. Below the comp pick threshold….

Erick V
Erick V(@erick-v)
Reply to  Kyle DeDiminicantanio
16 hours ago

Good deal on a solid player. He has been great on ST and has been good when called to hit the field.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
17 hours ago

John Breech’s grade on Johnson signing with the Browns:

Zion Johnson to the Browns (Three years, $49.5 million): D. This is a lot of money for a player who, at best, has just been OK. Last year, Zion Johnson ranked 54th out of 79 PFF-graded offensive linemen.

Erick V
Erick V(@erick-v)
Reply to  KevDiego
16 hours ago

Just think he was ranked 54 out of 79 and our best OL player by a mile. Not sure we got better at OG yet.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Reply to  Erick V
15 hours ago

I would argue that Joe Alt was our best OL player last year, but I get your point.

The frustrating thing to me is that the Tackle play was better than the IOL even though IOL was, for the most part, healthy all year. Excusing the bad 2025 OL play on “injury luck” is fuckin lazy. The IOL was the problem. Every reasonable fan saw this problem not addressed in the off-season. Without quality coaching, the shit players were exposed.

I have significantly more confidence in this coaching staff. I still want to upgrade at the Guard spots.

Erick V
Erick V(@erick-v)
22 hours ago

Kyle,

This series is a banger. I truly love the content.

One thing I noticed was that you said in an earlier part to this series was a theory that Hortiz didn’t spend in previous years because the organization didn’t feel the team was “ready to win” and that the roster and cap was finally in a place to really be aggressive and add some quality pieces in a real SB window. Well day 1 of Free Agency came and Hortiz had alligator arms once again reaching into his pockets to sign players. I can concede that the Linderbaum and Oweh contracts were steep, but guys like Seumalo, Zion, AVT or Edwards were signed for either reasonable or moderately higher deals while Hortiz was signing backup level players in Penning and Strange.

If the focus toward the roster and cap was 2026 why wasn’t the obsession to focus on comp picks baked into the 2025 offseason? Why was Hortiz trading away his beloved 2026 draft picks for players if 2025 was a set up year? So by your assertion, 2026 is now another set up year for the 2027 comp pick bonanza? Is there ever going to be a time for Hortiz to push the chips in, or does he just want to be “in the mix” every year hoping that one year everything breaks right in the playoffs?

We might have found a chink in the Hortiz armor. No matter the state of the roster or the cap, his unwavering philosophy is that he is just not going to spend in free agency, which is going to become a detriment, especially the way he has decided to handle the IOL in particular in his first two seasons. It’s like buying a home for your family of four. You take a few years of sacrificing and saving in order to get the finances in order to purchase one. To start, you might pass up on a few houses in your price range or slightly higher looking for something better, but as time goes on and inventory dries up, you might be forced to spend a little more than you wanted to finally land something that works for your family. Hortiz has decided to take his war chest and buy a one bathroom, 2 bedroom ranch with no yard hoping it works out.

At this rate, I would also be very concerned on a Tuli extension. If he wouldn’t go to the price to sign Oweh, who he drafted in the first round AND traded his coveted draft picks for, what makes you think he will break the bank on Tuli who he didn’t draft and has been significantly better to start his career than Oweh was in Baltimore?

Who knows, maybe that C+ Harbaugh got in the NFLPA ratings is real thing among the players and hinders the free agency options? Maybe the tax implications are a real sticking point? Unless it is something out of his control, Hortiz has underwhelmed in free agency yet again so far, and there’s sadly no evidence of this changing.

Arne-sixpakfrombelgium
Arne-sixpakfrombelgium(@arne-sixpakfrombelgium)
Reply to  Kyle DeDiminicantanio
19 hours ago

I agree with this take. Splashy FA signings are not the way Hortiz will do his GM business. This is only fine if it means solid extensions for key players and keeping the comp pick train rolling hard.

I hope they actually get some decent comp picks after this FA period. If I understand this matter correctly I think the St Juste 10 million for 2 years helps in that regard?

PS: this is such great content Kyle. Thank you very much!

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Reply to  Arne-sixpakfrombelgium
2 hours ago

Not a fan of “splashy” signings either, and the Linderbaum sweepstakes is a good example of one I’m quite ok we lost. BUT….we’ve also already missed out on some reasonably priced upgrades to last year’s IOL. FA is a roster building tool and there is money available to be utilizing it better than we’ve seen to date. Becton wasn’t “cheap” but he was a poor decision so I’m seeing some contradictory decisions with Hortiz.

I’m not bashing Hortiz…yet….but I am absolutely questioning his approach to building an IOL that will protect our most valuable asset. I have little doubt that McDaniels’ offense will help immensely in that regard but it won’t negate it. Penning and Cole Strange as our starting guards (and yes, I realize that’s a very early view) does not inspire confidence.

It looks like his philosophy is protect money to retain your core and fill in/build depth around them. That’s understandable. I’m just wondering when and how we substantially upgrade the arguably worst unit from the 2025 roster – the IOL. And now we must also significantly address the edge group too.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  Kyle DeDiminicantanio
13 hours ago

I think the lack of spending has more to do with Hortiz wanting dry powder for early extensions… Iโ€™m going to start writing articles on what the extensions could look like for Alt, Henley, McConkey, Still, Hart (though I think heโ€™s the odd man out), Tuli, and Derwin.

I get what you’re saying, but it doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. Of these players, here is when they are eligible for extension:

  • Tuli – this offseason; IMO he will get it
  • James – this offseason; IMO he will get it
  • Henley – this offseason; I don’t think he gets it this year… IMO he needs another prove it year; there is no reason right now to put him in the class of Tuli, James, Alt, McConkey as “must extend” players… he is replaceable unless he proves otherwise this season
  • Alt – next offseason, but he is also eligible for 5th year option next offseason, so not a given he gets an extension next year; but he probably does since the price tag would only go up by waiting another year
  • McConkey – next offseason; IMO he will get it
  • Still – next offseason; jury is out IMO as to whether to expect an extension then
  • Hart – next offseason; but I don’t expect he will get an extension unless he has a breakout performance this year

The cap should go up again next year. There is no reason to “keep powder dry” for extensions that are next offseason at the earliest. Obviously, it is important to be mindful about future season cap hit increases, but that is just GM 101.

Recent Chatter

Designed with WordPress

25
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x