Kyle and Ryan are back with a brand new episode of The PowderKeg Podcast, part of StormCloud โ€” and this time, weโ€™re running it like a fantasy draft.

Instead of players, weโ€™re drafting takes. From the Chargersโ€™ final 53-man roster to offseason evaluations and preseason surprises, we battled back and forth to build the best board of bold predictions and strong opinions.

Now weโ€™re throwing it to you, Bolt Fam: which draft board is better?
Did Kyle stack the stronger takes, or did Ryan come away with the win?

๐Ÿ‘‰ Watch the full episode here:


๐Ÿ‘‰ Drop your vote in the comments below or hit us up on social media with your pick.

The season is almost here โ€” and if this draft is any indication, itโ€™s going to be one wild ride.

Bolt up. Set it off. Welcome to The PowderKeg Podcast.

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
6 months ago

Great Podcast. Great to have football coming! A few comments:

  • While the Chargers ceiling will be determined by skill position and DL play, the floor will be determined by the IOL. Rolling back 2/3rds of the players was a huge disappointment. I think there are 7 dudes that can play in the NFL and a whole bunch of questions after that. Fortunately, the only player on the OL with an injury history are Pipkins and Becton (and I think Salyer may be better at tackle). If they have to play OL#8, the Chargers are in trouble.
  • I think Franklin keeps his powder dry until the last quarter of the season, then I expect him to be a difference maker in the post-season
  • The point on Devlin is spot-on. Who has he made better. They gave this coaching staff players with traits and they developed… Carson Barnhart? Terrible.
  • I think it’s going to be difficult for KLS to be active on gameday.
  • I’m disappointed in the front office’s management of the IOL personnel. However, chasing expensive FAs is not going to be a thing with this front office, and I think I agree with them. Now, we can talk about not drafting a center in 2024. That was a bad decision.
  • Not a Najee fan, but the current RB room is way better than 2024. I agree that Haskins was not good running the ball last year, but I also don’t think Rocket was all that this pre-season. Bold prediction: Rocket goes to exactly zero pro bowls and super bowls. His peak is NFL-average. He similar, and maybe marginally better than Vidal.
  • I think all the rookie receivers are going to see very little of the field early in the season. I can see Gadson’s role increase as the season plays out. Will be very interesting to see the progress.
Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  KevDiego
6 months ago

Bold prediction: Rocket goes to exactly zero pro bowls and super bowls.

LMAO at calling this a bold prediction about a UDFA.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Reply to  Tau837
6 months ago

It was meant as a joke. Lots of people were acting like the dude was the second coming of Ekeler. I liked Rocket fine. Would have liked the dude on the practice squad. Nothing I saw in the pre-season screamed Austin Ekeler. Let’s see how he does in Cleveland (where he may actually get some snaps on a very bad team). I do not think Rocket being on or off the team changes the 2025 win total for the LAC.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  KevDiego
6 months ago

Lots of people were acting like the dude was the second coming of Ekeler. I liked Rocket fine. Would have liked the dude on the practice squad. Nothing I saw in the pre-season screamed Austin Ekeler. 

I have never seen anyone compare him to Ekeler. If they compared them because both were UDFA RBs who did/could make the final roster, that isn’t unreasonable. Obviously, stylistically there is no comparison.

I do not think Rocket being on or off the team changes the 2025 win total for the LAC.

Outside of QB, there are very few players on a NFL roster who are worth a win on their own. Of course a UDFA RB who would have been RB3 or RB4 at best wouldn’t change the win total.

But if you want to use that to judge Sanders’ release, you could say the same thing about 30+ players on the Chargers roster right now.

Herbert alone is worth multiple wins. Slater might have been worth a win (one). Alt might be. McConkey might be. I doubt any player on the current defense is worth a full win. James would be closest.

It’s the nature of the game. 46-48 players are active on gameday. Credit for a win/loss must be divided among them (and arguably the coaches) based on their roles and performance.

PFF tracks a Wins Above Replacement (WAR) metric. For the 10 seasons 2011-2020, the highest non-QB was Antonio Brown (7.137). The highest defender was Richard Sherman (5.297).

But, obviously, that doesn’t change the fact that you need every player on the 53 man roster and practice squad to be as good as they can possibly be.

Had the Chargers kept a 4th RB, I believe it would have been Sanders. But they didn’t, and that makes sense given that Harris is appparently much closer to ready than we thought. He would be on the practice squad and likely elevated for week 1 had he not been claimed.

Last edited 6 months ago by Tau837
KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Reply to  Tau837
6 months ago

The point with Rocket is the level of fan angst with the Browns claiming him is, in my opinion, unwarranted. I was fine with him as RB4. I do agree with your points that he out-played Vidal in the pre-season. I thought the most reasonable approach was to put Najee on IR and keep Rocket. Let’s see how Harris looks this week vs. the Chiefs vs. playing time Rocket gets for the Browns.

Recent Chatter

  1. Wow. That’s brutal. If you add the highest US Federal tax rate (37%) to the CA state tax rate (13.3%),…

  2. https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/merrill-kelly-rejected-padres-lucrative-193413725.html So, someone said the quite part out loud. As the California tax rates continue to increase, I have to…

  3. The obvious answer is that a different group of players responded this year than last year, in part because there…

Designed with WordPress

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x