We’ve just released Episode 107 of the Thunder Down Under Chargers Podcast.

Our synopsis for Episode 107 is below:

TDU IS BACK IN TOWN! After a restful break, we return to the airwaves to discuss all the recent Chargers news and the team’s 2025 offseason plan. Oh yes, the Big Bear, Joey Bosa has been released. The Combine has come and gone. But there are still so many questions left for us to answer. Should other players be cut? Is a Metcalf Mega Trade on the horizon? Which free agents (internal or external) will Hortiz sign? We address it all on our first show of TDU Season 4. Don’t miss it!”

You can also listen on Spotify below (or download on audio wherever you like to listen to podcasts):

As always, you can support us by doing any or all of the following:

– Rec’ing this post and leaving any thoughts/feedback you have in the comments section below.

– Following us on Twitter (and ‘liking’ our tweets) at @TDU_Chargers, or individually, at @TDU_Alister, @TDU_Jack and @TDU_Andy.

– ‘Subscribing’ to our YouTube channel, clicking the ‘Like’ button for today’s episode, and engaging with us in the comments section.

– Giving us a rating and leaving a review on the Thunder Down Under Podcast page on Apple Podcasts (and ‘subscribing’).

– Spreading the good word to all of your awesome Chargers friends and family and encouraging them to listen to our show (and engage with us on social media).

Hope you enjoy the episode! Thanks so much for listening 🙂

Alister (@TDU_Alister)

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
44 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
11 months ago

Zeitler signed with the Titans. So missed out on him, Fries, Mekari, Banks, and Bredeson, among other guards.
As far as I know, the best guards still available are Teven Jenkins, Mekhi Becton, and Will Hernandez. I hope they will sign at least one of them.

66_Jimbo
66_Jimbo(@66_jimbo)
11 months ago

Engram signs 2 year deal with Broncos

Erick V
Erick V(@evolz3737)
Reply to  66_Jimbo
11 months ago

 66_Jimbo Doesn’t bother me to much. He’s getting older and isn’t really a scheme fit.

66_Jimbo
66_Jimbo(@66_jimbo)
Reply to  Erick V
11 months ago

 Erick V Maybe John will swing them a sweet deal for Andrews…

66_Jimbo
66_Jimbo(@66_jimbo)
11 months ago

Cooper Kupp being released….any interest in a slow-ish vet?

Erick V
Erick V(@evolz3737)
Reply to  66_Jimbo
11 months ago

 66_Jimbo Honestly, I gave no idea what this FO plan is to address weapons in the passing game. If the last 48 hours give us any indication, I would say there’s no chance we sign him.

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
11 months ago

Seems like the blush is coming off the Hortiz/Harbaugh rose a bit prematurely, IMO. We were pretty clearly told that they weren’t going to make splashy, top of the market signings. To date, that’s right where we are. 
 
I’m excited to see them draft and develop. My biggest concern(s) right now that are questionable to be resolved via the draft? Weapons for Herbert (particularly TE for me) and an upgrade at center. I think we can draft an upgrade to Pipkins. If the top 2 draft TE’s are gone, the rest are unproven and/or “just guys”. 
 
Poona was too expensive, IMO. It’s a deep DT class. We need to draft 1-2. Same for edge, though that class isn’t as deep. WR is a question….moreso with Palmer gone but I believe his production can be replaced pretty easily. There are guys in the draft who will be available later that match his size and ability.
 
I know some don’t like the Harris signing. I think he’ll fit right in with what Harbaugh wants and he’s been durable. Remember what Harbaugh said about availability being the best ability? That’s likely why Bozeman got his new contract too.
 
My biggest 👍🏼 is that Mack is back for a reasonable amount. I know he’s 34 and can’t produce forever. I also know he brings a presence to this team that isn’t easily replaced and I don’t mean just on the field.
 
I’m not mad at our staff/front office at all. I don’t think 2025 is our SB year. I wanna see a deeper playoff run and growth in the “Harbaugh vision”. I think 2026 is the reasonable exoectation for a championship. If it’s sooner, yay.

Erick V
Erick V(@evolz3737)
Reply to  Buck Melanoma
11 months ago

 Buck Melanoma Buck you might be right, but with a more difficult schedule next year how bad would it be to the culture building to have like a 7-10 non playoff season? I get that building through the draft and developing players for sustained success is the ultimate goal, but this lack of urgency in FA is a little alarming. Not that it’s over, but any players that would be improvements over what we currently have or have already lost are dwindling by the day. I get that they don’t want to overpay, but they might have misjudged this market to the detriment of next seasons success. At this point the team is objectively worse now than it was a week ago, and I wouldn’t count on round 5 picks becoming valued starters every draft. There’s to many holes to fill just with draft picks and only 3 of them in the top 100 in a weaker draft than previous years. We might be taking a step back before taking a step forward.

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
11 months ago

I’m good with not overpaying, ours or theirs. Let’s get some draft and develop going.
 
My biggest concern remains center.

KathmanduSteve
KathmanduSteve(@kathmandusteve)
11 months ago

We can wait for the overpriced first coupla days to pass.  It isn’t the end of times.  We got Mack back, and at a real bargain.  
Thanks, Khalil!

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
11 months ago

Feeling fairly frustrated and impatient right now.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Reply to  Tau837
11 months ago

This is not a leadership team that is going to make splashy FA signings.

I think I would have paid Ford, but my guess is that the team’s plan is to build through the draft.

Adams went for about the top of what I thought would have been reasonable. No way I would have paid the $ and draft capitol for Metcalf. Surprised by how much Palmer signed for.

The worst thing I’ve seen today is re-signing Bozeman. I do not want to watch another season of Herbert getting crushed while Brad is standing around blocking air.

UncleJammsArmy
UncleJammsArmy(@unclejammsarmy)
Reply to  KevDiego
11 months ago

 KevDiego as it stands now, we’re running back the same shitty IOL from last year. Bozeman re-signed, Pipkins still on the roster, so is Zion. I know it’s early, but how did we not get Mekari among others. Who is left? Fries and Kelly?

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Reply to  UncleJammsArmy
11 months ago

Fries, Mekhi Becton (a 6’7″, 363lbs dude should make the OL more physical)

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  UncleJammsArmy
11 months ago

 UncleJammsArmy I believe Kelly signed somewhere. Fries and Zeitler are still possible as far as I know. Maybe Juwan Johnson, or, even better, Mark Andrews if he is cut. WR choices are slim pickings.
But, hey, we signed Najee!!! Ugh.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  KevDiego
11 months ago

 KevDiego I hate the phrase “splashy FA signings.” It is a phrase used to imply that such signings are bad, and, thus, not having any equates to good process. I don’t agree. Good process is good process. It can lead to good signings on day one of free agency just as easily as it can lead to bargain signings like what we saw last season.

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Reply to  Tau837
11 months ago

 Tau837 splashy to me just means high visibility, probably high priced. I put no positive or negative spin on the terminology.
 
They told us they weren’t going after players that would likely command big salaries. That’s how they’re proceeding.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  Buck Melanoma
11 months ago

 Buck Melanoma I’m not aware they told us that. Hortiz has repeatedly said it is important to be responsible about spending. Being responsible does not equate to not signing any high value contract players. Those things are not the same.
Results so far:

No WR upgrade
No G upgrade
No C upgrade
No TE upgrade
Edge downgrade
IDL downgrade
RB change, but upgrade/downgrade (Harris vs. Dobbins/Edwards) unclear at this point
CB change, but upgrade/downgrade (Jackson vs. Fulton) unclear at this point

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Reply to  Tau837
11 months ago

 Tau837 I don’t think paying big money for WR’s that either have spotty production (Metcalf) or are well on the wrong side of 30 (Adams) falls into the responsible category.
 
I expect both IDL (deep DT class) and IOL to be addressed in the draft. And there are still FA guards available, just as there are still FA TE’s available. 
 
I’m on record since last year with my concerns about center. Bozeman likely got his deal because he was available all year. I may have misspoke about just what Hortiz said but I know Harbaugh made the statement that availability is the best ability. Nearly certain it was said in the Pat McAfee interview at the Combine.
 
Edge….again, I expect a draft pick. Maybe 2. And with Bosa’s injury history? I think there’s room to get better in the draft.
 
You were on record, IIRC, saying you had no interest in Harris. Like it or not, I think he fits the mold of a Harbaugh guy….tough and available. He’s stayed healthy….Dobbins doesn’t have that history.
 
CB I don’t know. I do know Jackson is a fit for what Minter prefers to do which is mostly run zone. And he’s a good run defender. I’m more than ok with not having another JC Jackson situation.
 
I want to see the team headed more in the draft and develop direction. This may be a turn toward that. We’ll see. I think Hortiz stayed true to what he said, even though I did overstate it. He’s making responsible moves. Maybe we fans just need to be a bit more patient.

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Reply to  Buck Melanoma
11 months ago

One more thing re: center…..I would have been fine with Kelly, especially at $9M/yr, but he could just as easily become a Linsley signing since he’s 30+ and coming off of an injury, I believe?
 
You said repeatedly Dalman wasn’t a fit so let’s take the other quality FA center off the board.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  Buck Melanoma
11 months ago

@buck-melanoma 
Drafting and developing is fine. I’m all for it. But by my count, they ideally need at least 7 new starters:

RB 1a/b – to pair with Harris; not on roster
WR 2 – to upgrade Johnston and pair with McConkey; not on roster
TE 1a/b – to pair with Dissly; not on roster
RG – to replace Pipkins
IDL (NT) – to replace Ford
IDL (pass rusher) – to replace Fox
Edge 1a/b – to replace Joey and pair with Mack

Not to mention other key depth roles (WR, C, QB2, LB, CB, S). No way to adequately address all of that in one draft, hence the need to use the prodigious cap space to properly augment the draft and ideally do it to obtain multiple high quality starters.
It obviously makes sense to pay top of market value for players, as long as you identify the right players. The Chargers are doing that with Herbert and James now, and will soon likely sign Slater to a top of market extension this offseason.
Of course, we know they weren’t willing to do it for Bosa, Allen, or Williams. Maybe the latter two because of their valuation of the WR position, hard to know for sure. Bosa presumably just wasn’t a value at the price established by the previous front office.
But we know this front office and coaching staff values the trenches. The Chargers clearly need OL upgrades to as many as all 3 IOL positions, and they clearly need 2 starter caliber IDL. Even ignoring all of the other positions, those are 5 positions in the trenches. More than anything, I am surprised that have made zero moves to address those needs so far.
I can’t figure out how they are going to spend their cap space. Barring injuries or unexpected events, I can identify 44 of the final 53 man roster spots:

27 core players who entered offseason under contract for 2025

Justin Herbert
Derwin James
Rashawn Slater
Joe Alt
Alohi Gilman
Will Dissly
Zion Johnson
Quentin Johnston
Bud Dupree
Jamaree Salyer
Cameron Dicker
Ladd McConkey
Tuli Tuipulotu
Daiyan Henley
Josh Harris
Junior Colson
Derius Davis
Otito Ogbonnia
Justin Eboigbe
Ja’Sir Taylor
Deane Leonard
Hassan Haskins
Scott Matlock
Tarheeb Still
Cam Hart
Kimani Vidal
Brenden Rice

7 players signed to new contracts for 2025 so far

Khalil Mack
Najee Harris
Donte Jackson
Elijah Molden
J.K. Scott
Bradley Bozeman
Tucker Fisk

10 draft picks

I realize all 10 probably won’t make the final roster, but most should, so this cost seems to be at least a reasonable proxy

So there are 9 more spots to fill, and my calculations show they have more than $54M in 2025 cap space available to do it, having already accounted for those 44 players and dead cap, and having reserved around $11.2M for in season expenses.
I expect most of those 9 positions to go to players like Smartt, Fehoko, Niemann, Dye, Heinicke or equivalent players, who will collectively account for $10M or less against the 2025 cap. So maybe $44M for 4-6 higher paid positions.
It seems possible that Slater’s extension could raise his cap number a bit, even though that situation typically results in a cap hit reduction. But even if it goes up, it shouldn’t be by much.
I would love to believe the Ravens could cut Mark Andrews before his roster bonus due Monday and the Chargers could sign him to a multi-year deal. But will they actually cut him?
Beyond that I’m kind of stumped for now.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
11 months ago

Only have a brief moment, but wanted to do a quick post:

Great job on the podcast. I am continually impressed (and a little embarrassed) that three dudes from Australia know more about football than I do.

I agree with the assessment of Metcalf. No way he was worth 5/$150. That’s crazy. Its also crazy that the Bills paid Palmer 3/$36. Good time to be a WR. I guess the focus for the Chargers now is draft & develop.

Good deal retaining Mack. Makes sense for both sides.

Ford going to the Rams for 3/$30 is a bit frustrating. I would rather have kept him for that price, but the plan now has to be drafting 2 or more interior DL in a very deep draft. That and resigning Tart.

WTF are the Chargers going to spend their cap on? Has to be interior OL.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
11 months ago

My expectations for today were very low. This is not a front office that is going to pay splashy external FAs. That’s just not what they do (and I think I agree with the approach). The things that sort-of surprised me that I do not like:

  • Signing Harris. “Not a lot of tread left on those very slow-moving tires.” as they say. I guess they view him as the Gus replacement. We will see. The interior of the OL needs to be fixed or Harris will look like 2024 Gus
  • Retaining Pipkins. At best, he’s your swing tackle. His contract is not aligned with his role on the team (or what his role should be).

What I want the team to do:

  • The Chargers need to figure out center and Bozeman is not the answer. I think Josh Meyers is the best FA remaining, which means the Chargers are likely going to fill the need in the draft? Not a lot of centers there, so you’re going to draft a guard with traits and teach them center, which sounds like a project, which sounds like Bozeman starting the year at center, which sounds like early season pain for Herbert….
  • If they’re going to sign a flashy FA, I like Mekhi Becton. The dude is 6’7″, 363 lbs. That and a competent center could really change the attitude of the OL.
  • Just an aside, the Chargers had an UDFA on IR all year: Tyler McLellan. He’s listed as a 6’8″, 355 Tackle. I thought he looked great in the pre-season, then blew out his knee. An OL of Slater-Johnson-Rookie-Becton-Alt with McLellan coming at TE could really move defenses off the LOS
  • It’s pretty clear that the Chargers are going to draft:
  • IDL (1-2)
  • Edge (day 2)
  • RB
  • TE (Loveland if he’s there in the 1st)
  • C/G (likely day 2)
  • LB (day 3)
Erick V
Erick V(@evolz3737)
Reply to  KevDiego
11 months ago

 KevDiego Kev, it’s obvious they don’t prioritize offensive playmakers outside of RB, so Loveland is probably not even a consideration honestly. With that being the case Rd1 needs to be an Edge. Mack is 34 and on a 1 year deal and Dupree is on his last legs also. This is a deep Edge class as far as the top talent, but waiting until day 2 at #55 probably leaves the 15th best Edge player available at best, like a Jared Ivey or Jordan Burch who are not the players this team needs as a starter post Mack. This team needs more of speed element off the Edge like a Pearce or Ezeiruaku which will only be available day one. At this point, just add to the defense as much as possible and try to be the 2000 Ravens. Winning with defense and by turning an elite QB into a game manager that hands it off 30 times a game.
I would say IOL could be an option in Rd1, but the talent pool just isn’t there IMO outside of Zabel who still might be a reach at #22 . Taking playmakers out of the equation in Rd1 leaves us with Edge, DT or CB. Kenneth Grant might be an option also, but the way this free agency is going, we will need just about everything but QB in the draft.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Reply to  Erick V
11 months ago

 Erick V I don’t think Dupree was ever very good.  What I saw in 2024 was a dude with some athletic talent, but not a very smart player (similar to Bozeman).  So, I agree that edge is a need.
For the draft, I think they’re going to have a plan going in, but will react to the way the board falls, which I agree with.  They can then backfill with tier 2 FAs after the draft (similar to last year).
Not flashy, but this is the way quality rosters are built.

Erick V
Erick V(@evolz3737)
Reply to  KevDiego
11 months ago

 KevDiego I’m starting to think more and more that this FO doesn’t feel they are close enough with the roster to be a little more aggressive in FA, but honestly if they are planning on getting the roster there with late round comp picks, it might never get there. A revolving door of 1 year deals just keeps the cycle of holes going. There’s a real possibility they misjudged the FA market this year and had some sticker shock, otherwise why be so diligent to clear 90M if they had no intention of using it? If comp picks are the main goal, they could have kept Bosa and not created another roster hole which probably would have netted them a 4th Rd comp pick. With this approach to FA there was really no reason to clear as much space as they did. And in reality, how are they improved? If anything, the roster is worse. We have no choice but to see how it plays out, but I’m not impressed with this off seasons process so far.
Look, I believe in Hortiz and he is who I wanted to run the ship because I thought he was seasoned under one of the best FO in the league for 20 years. But I question two things.
1. Is this another Belechick type situation where coaches who were hired from his staff (Mangini, McDaniels, Patricia, Judge) tried to emulate him to a fault instead of being their own person? I get that he came from a successful Ravens organization, but that culture has been built for decades. They didn’t start out that way. We don’t have to be a carbon copy of their process immediately. We might need to take a different route to eventually get to where they are now.
2. Could Harbaugh be the problem with the roster building? He had his issues with the GM in SF, which led him to be cast off. Was it that he wanted to much control of how the roster was built or had a stale vision for team construction from his playing days? After all he had no such constraints in college. You can’t pick the players, the players pick you. If this is the case, maybe Hortiz is acquiescing to him now in roster build?
Of course, this is just speculation and maybe completely off base, but I am having a hard time seeing the plan for this roster build/free agency cycle.

Kyle DeDiminicantanio
Admin
Reply to  Erick V
11 months ago

 Erick V This is definitely a great conversation to have – it’s worth trying to explore the potential weaknesses of the staff, and help us understand how rosters will be constructed in future years.

However, it’s still super early. When they DO start spending (hopefully not if 🙂 ) that money can go surprisingly fast. 

KathmanduSteve
KathmanduSteve(@kathmandusteve)
11 months ago

On to Darius Slayton discussions, it seems.

66_Jimbo
66_Jimbo(@66_jimbo)
11 months ago

Cancel the debate. Both are gone.

BurningBolt
BurningBolt(@burningbolt)
11 months ago

I prefer Metcalf to Adams as the much better fit for the Chargers.  In 2020, the deep passing attack was a thing of beauty.  Herbert’s elite ability in that aspect of the game was on full display.  It was the best part of our offense.  
Unfortunately, for reasons escaping all understanding Telesco/Staley/Lombardi completely abandoned that approach in not valuing the retention of deep speed at WR.
We have a chance to fix that in part by securing the services of a strong and very fast X receiver in his prime in Metcalf in a year in which useful options at WR are limited in both the draft and free agency.
Our current offense focuses more on the intermediate and longer passing game than Lombardi’s offense did because that kind of passing game is a superior complement to Roman’s ground attack than the short passing game which takes place in the same vertical range as the ground game does.
Adams, by contrast, is 32 and will be in decline soon.  Also, Adams has feasted on anticipatory back shoulder passes, which is not Herbert’s strength because it never has had to be in light of his natural arm talent.  I do not see a great fit with Adams either with Herbert or with what our offense could be.
I believe that a better idea would be to not only to acquire Metcalf, but also to draft Golden or Egbuka at 1-22 (assuming Egbuka runs in the 4.3s) and to follow that up by selecting one trick pony Deont’e Thornton late in the draft (possibly even round 7).
I would sign Evan Engram.
Not only will speed everywhere force defenses to remain honest, which should help both the running game and McConkey, but it should also help create mismatches that can be exploited with slower defenders being forced to keep pace with faster receivers, something very different than has been the case with Allen, Williams, Palmer, et cetera, who are typically not going to beat defenders downfield with any regularity.
In my world, Palmer would be gone.  Johnston would get to develop as one heck of a WR4.  Thornton would be the do not break glass except in case of emeregency WR5 or even WR6 with Davis getting some occasional run.  I do not have much faith in Rice or any other WRs.
I do realize that even if we re-sign our own, we have or could potentially have needs at C, RG, TE, EDGE, DT, RB and CB that require attention.  I would re-sign Dobbins, Ford and Tart.  I would not pursue/release Samuel, Palmer, Pipkins.  I would consider re-signing Bozeman and Perryman as depth on team friendly deals.  I would pursue a good EDGE (Young, Sweat) in free agency.  I like the previously discussed notion of signing Kelly and Fries.
As for the draft, I like the scarce good WR at 1-22 as noted above.  I really like Tyler Warren and like Jeanty, but they will not be there at 1-22.  Honestly, I think skillsets similar to Loveland’s can be acquired later in the draft, so I do not think we need to go there at 1-22 despite the “bazillion” mock drafts that have us going that way.  I think there are good EDGE players in the round 2-3 range.  I would love for us to be able to get both Bhayshul Tuten (like the idea of having a second homerun hitter at RB if we re-sign Dobbins) and a good C on day 3, but I have reservations about that as a possibility.
Anyway, that is my $.02.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
11 months ago

Agree, Adams > Metcalf, all things considered. I do not view Adams as a diva. He definitely wants the ball and can get frustrated when he doesn’t get it, but that is often when he doesn’t get it because the QB can’t get it to him. I don’t think that latter aspect will be a problem with Herbert.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
11 months ago

 TDU_Alister Great post. Outstanding post. Thanks for putting so much depth into it.
I’m going to focus on where I disagree, since I agree with a lot:

Out of the players you said you would not re-sign, my one disagreement is with Scott.

Re-signing him keeps a familiar player and avoids the need to find an alternative.
Importantly, based on reporting I have seen, Scott punts in accordance with what Fickens wants, focusing on hang time. If true, I assume Fickens wants him back.

Out of the internal free agent players you said you would re-sign, I disagree with these:

Perryman – I have posted my reasons previously.
Mustipher – He was awful. If you want to re-sign him to fill out the 90 man roster, with the idea that he will be waived at final roster cuts, fine. But nothing more than that for me.
Palmer – He is the epitome of “just a guy,” a replacement level player. If the Chargers sign Adams, as I think they should, and have him and McConkey as 1a/1b, with Johnston as #3 , at least for 2025, I think they can find a better WR4 than Palmer, relative to pricetag.

As for Fulton – He is a maybe for me. I wouldn’t mind if he is re-signed, but I think there is an argument that, given the available cap space, it might make sense to pay more for a better player. I definitely agree with signing a veteran free agent outside CB to start.
For external free agents:

At WR, IMO Adams followed by Godwin are the good options, so I disagree somewhat with how you characterized some of these players.
At RB, IMO all of the RBs you named are bad options. Prefer to re-sign Dobbins and pair with a rookie in a 1a/1b combo.
At TE, IMO Johnson is the only good option, with Gesicki next but not good. No interest in Engram.
At G, I’m fine with Zeitler for 1 year, but prefer Fries and Mekari. I would sign two of these players, release Pipkins, and let Zion and the other two battle it out for the two starting G spots.
At CB:

Ward has said he will not play for a California team again. His daughter died last season, and the associated pain is apparently the root of that. So he may not be a candidate.
Alexander would probably be too expensive.
I would be happy with signing either Davis or Reed.
Don’t agree Slay is a good option. Too old. Don’t want to take the risk.
Don’t agree Douglas should be viewed as a “bad option”. I would be fine with signing him.

Don’t agree with the need to sign any external LBs. IMO Henley is LB1, Colson should step into LB2 role, I would re-sign Dye as LB3, and I would re-sign Niemann and draft 1-2 LBs to compete for the LB4/5 roles (if 5 LBs make final roster).
At IDL:

Don’t agree with signing Campbell. He is a great story, but don’t want to sign a 38.5 year old at the position. Unnecessary risk vs. resources choice. No.
Would absolutely sign Williams. IMO he could be a difference maker if paired with Ford, Tart, and Mack. He is worth a top of market deal IMO.

Agree with signing Sweat, particularly if they cannot re-sign Mack. If they do re-sign Mack, I would still consider signing Sweat, but that would alse enable the team to pivot to the draft for a Bosa replacement.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
11 months ago

 TDU_Alister On Milton, he is a very strong pass rusher (top PFF grade pass rushing grade among all IDL). You characterize him as having a limited role, but he played 653 defensive snaps in 2024. Ford led the Chargers’ IDL with 652. Is that really limited?
His run defense in 2024 was not good, at least per PFF grade, but it was very good in 2022-2023. So it seems he isn’t necessarily a problem there.
My main objective is for the Chargers to sign a near top of market players in some position group where they have need. They may never again be in a position with $90M+ in cap space plus 10 draft picks. They have an amazing amount of choice in how to build the roster around the nucleus… they may never have this level of flexibility again. Need to take advantage of it.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
11 months ago

 TDU_Alister Part of my reasoning is the cap space they have available. Let’s go position by position, looking for where it could be resonable to make a significant investment:

QB – Unnecessary
RB – No reason to sign anyone more expensive than Dobbins; they should re-sign him, but price should be modest
WR – Adams
TE – If Andrews gets released, IMO the Chargers should sign him
OT – Unnecessary
OG – Some good players are available, and I think the Chargers should sign 1-2 of them… none should be top of market in terms of contract value
C – No great player available who is a good scheme fit, though I would be fine with signing Kelly
Edge – Sweat?
IDL – Williams, Odighizuwa
LB – Unnecessary IMO
CB – Should sign starting veteran outside corner and could spend here for Davis or maybe a couple others
S – Unnecessary

To me, it seems like it comes down to WR, Edge, IDL, and CB where they can leverage their tremendous cap space to sign one or more top performers. IMO they two high market players from those position groups.
I realize that the draft is strong at Edge and IDL, so maybe that implies they should sign Adams and a corner like Davis, then take those positions out of play early in the draft in order to focus on others, like Edge and IDL. 

Recent Chatter

  1. https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/merrill-kelly-rejected-padres-lucrative-193413725.html So, someone said the quite part out loud. As the California tax rates continue to increase, I have to…

  2. The obvious answer is that a different group of players responded this year than last year, in part because there…

  3. If Hortiz is ever going to spend big on an external free agent, Linderbaum is exactly the type. Hortiz was…

Designed with WordPress

44
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x