We’ve just released Episode 112 of the Thunder Down Under Chargers Podcast.

Our synopsis for Episode 112 is below:

The 2025 NFL Draft is officially in the books, and the Los Angeles Chargers have added 9 new rookies to the squad! In this episode, we break down the entire Chargers 2025 draft class, analyse each pick, and discuss how they fit into Jim Harbaugh’s vision for the team.

We’ll give out draft grades, spotlight our biggest steals and surprises, and dive into which teams won (and lost) the weekend across the NFL. Whether you’re a die-hard #BoltFam member or just following your team’s rivals, you won’t want to miss this full recap of an action-packed draft! Don’t miss it!

You can also listen on Spotify below (or download on audio wherever you like to listen to podcasts):

As always, you can support us by doing any or all of the following:

– Rec’ing this post and leaving any thoughts/feedback you have in the comments section below.

– Following us on Twitter (and ‘liking’ our tweets) at @TDU_Chargers, or individually, at @TDU_Alister, @TDU_Jack and @TDU_Andy.

– ‘Subscribing’ to our YouTube channel, clicking the ‘Like’ button for today’s episode, and engaging with us in the comments section.

– Giving us a rating and leaving a review on the Thunder Down Under Podcast page on Apple Podcasts (and ‘subscribing’).

– Spreading the good word to all of your awesome Chargers friends and family and encouraging them to listen to our show (and engage with us on social media).

Hope you enjoy the episode! Thanks so much for listening 🙂

Alister (@TDU_Alister)

AL
COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTOR
TDU_Alister
Community Contributor

Long time team fan, podcaster (with Thunder Down Under Chargers Podcast), husband to a beautiful wife, friend to all fellow Chargers fanatics, and father-to-be!

View All Articles →
58 Comments
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
58 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Member
10 months ago
KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Member
10 months ago

Great podcast – Appreciate the time you guys put into this. Jack, the personalized musical player introductions…Awesome mate!

On Hampton:

  • I agree that Omarion is going to be a very productive member of the Chargers for the next 5+ years. Unlike other late 1st round Charger picks, this picks makes the Chargers significantly better
  • I do agree with Al’s point on the process – My counter-point; If the previous regime needed an RB, they would trade multiple picks to move up in the draft. Would I have rather taken the trade and moved back? Absolutely, but I think picking what I think most of us agree was BPA at that point was not a bad use of draft capitol. Another argument against the usage: Picking up the 5th round option is going to be expensive. If you hit on a player with your first round pick, you want to be able to lock that player down for 5 years. If Zion Johnson was an all-pro guard, would/could the Chargers pick up his 5th year option (and make him the highest paid Guard in the NFL)? Using 1st round picks on positions you cannot afford to pick up the 5th round option on is not smart
  • As far as usage, this year, the Chargers should give Najee the majority of the snaps early in the season (and even work in RB3 in games). Heading into the playoffs, having a healthy, rested Hampton in addition to Tre Harris getting comfortable at WR2, will make the Charges a much more difficult opponent

Tre Harris & Dre Lambert-Smith:

  • I think both picks were good use of draft capitol. A for process
  • The WR room is now very crowded. I think Rick will be lucky to make the PS.
  • The biggest question in my mind is what happens to QJ. I think there’s chance he does not make the team. Jalen Reagor was picked with the 21st pick in the 2020 draft. The Eagles cut his ass after 2 seasons. QJ was drafted with the 21st pick 2023 draft. Good teams move on from bad decisions. After seeing his limitations on full display in the Texans game, I think he’s on the bubble.
  • Last offseason, I was questioning if Davis could make the roster. I thought Davis made some good catches and showed some potential. I put his odds of making the roster higher than QJ
  • Prediction for WR room: McConkey, Harris, Lambert-Smith, MWill, Davis, Reagor, with Rice and Fitzpatrick to the PS

Caldwell:

  • Like the pick & use of draft capitol. Great pick at this spot.
  • I still wish the Chargers would have used one of their day-3 picks on another interior DL. Just like the center position, the Chargers have not done enough in the center of their lines – the one thing that could hold them back in 2025.

Kennard:

  • Not a fan of this pick. He screams Chris Rumph to me.
  • This is definitely a project for the coaching staff. He has the motor/attitude. If he can learn how to play the position and spends all his off time with Ben Herbert, he could be valuable in 2026

Gadsden:

  • Loved this pick, both the move up to get him and the pick.
  • This brings something different (and needed) to the TE room. Very excited to see how Gadsden looks in Roman systems

Branson Taylor:

  • The Chargers are acquiring very large humans to play OL
  • Joe Alt is 6’8″ 322
  • Taylor is 6’6″, 322
  • Becton is 6’7″, 363
  • Tyler McLellan is 6’8″, 355 – by the way, I think Tyler makes the team
  • These are all large men that can move. I like the direction
  • I still have no idea who’s going to play center. I hope it’s going to be James. I can’t take another year of Bozeman calling protections.
  • Side note – The Chargers did not pick up the 5th round option on Zion – this was the right decision. I know that everyone gave Telesco kudos for this pick and blame Zion for failing, but I think the worst part of his game is mental, and the center has to be accountable for that. With a quality center, I think Zion would be much better.

Bridges/Mickens:

  • Guys with traits and productivity – good value for the picks
  • Will be interesting to see how each of these players fit into the roster. I think both have a long way to make the 53, but both should develop on the PS. I think Leonard and especially Tailor are going to struggle to make this roster.

Sorry for not being very engaged. Our company is growing like crazy and I’m the single point of failure on far to many fronts. Hope to hire some reinforcements before the season starts.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  KevDiego
10 months ago

@kevdiego 


Another argument against the usage: Picking up the 5th round option is going to be expensive. If you hit on a player with your first round pick, you want to be able to lock that player down for 5 years. If Zion Johnson was an all-pro guard, would/could the Chargers pick up his 5th year option (and make him the highest paid Guard in the NFL)? Using 1st round picks on positions you cannot afford to pick up the 5th round option on is not smart

This is an interesting point I have not seen mentioned anywhere, but I don’t know if it is valid.
The Steelers declined Harris’s 5th year option for 2025. His option would have been for $6.79M. His cap hit in 2024 was $4.15M. That doesn’t really strike me as an unaffordable increase. I speculate it was more about the fact that the Steelers felt his level of performance was replaceable at lower cost, perhaps combined with concern that his workload will inevitably catch up to him and his durability will not continue.
Meanwhile, the Chargers exercised Slater’s 5th year option for 2025 for $19.04M. His cap hit in 2024 was $5.29M. Slater deserved that significant increase and deserves the top of market extension he is going to get.
According to OverTheCap, had the Chargers exercised Zion’s 5th year option, it would have been for $17.56M. I agree with their decision not to do that, because it would have been a big increase for an underperforming player.
I haven’t given this much thought, but these data points seem to make the case that a RB 5th year option is more affordable than other positions… and that seems like a positive, not a negative.

The biggest question in my mind is what happens to QJ. I think there’s chance he does not make the team. Jalen Reagor was picked with the 21st pick in the 2020 draft. The Eagles cut his ass after 2 seasons. QJ was drafted with the 21st pick 2023 draft. Good teams move on from bad decisions. After seeing his limitations on full display in the Texans game, I think he’s on the bubble.
Last offseason, I was questioning if Davis could make the roster. I thought Davis made some good catches and showed some potential. I put his odds of making the roster higher than QJ
Prediction for WR room: McConkey, Harris, Lambert-Smith, MWill, Davis, Reagor, with Rice and Fitzpatrick to the PS


I disagree on Johnston.
First of all, all first round draft pick rookie contracts have been fully guaranteed since the 2022 NFL draft. So citing an example from before that is not a valid comparison.
Second, the Eagles didn’t cut Reagor, they traded him to Minnesota in August 2022 for a 2023 7th and 2024 4th. They took a $1.8M dead money cap hit in both 2022 and 2023.
Johnston’s contract is fully guaranteed. Per Spotrac:

If the Chargers cut him after June 1, they will incur a 2025 dead cap hit of $6.55M and a 2026 dead cap hit of $1.83M.
If they instead trade him after June 1, they will incur a $1.83M dead cap hit in both 2025 and 2026.

If the Chargers are determined to move on from him, a trade might make sense, if some other team is willing to give enough value for him. I don’t think a 7th or even 6th round pick is enough.
IMO it makes more sense to keep him at least one more season. Johnston was a consensus first round pick in 2023. There are valid reasons for that.
Johnston’s PFF receiving grade last season ranked #69 out of 158 WRs with at least 10 targets. That is not terrible, it is roughly average. On the Chargers, his grade was better than Reagor’s and Chark’s and effectively the same as Palmer’s (Palmer 68.3 vs. Johnson 68.2).
He improved last season. With Williams and Harris now on the roster, he can take his snaps in 2025 at Z and hopefully run different routes that are better suited to his skill set.
I can’t see any basis to believe Reagor should and will beat out Johnston for the last WR spot on the final roster. Unless due to serious injury to Johnston.
I think McConkey, Williams, Harris, Lambert-Smith, Johnton, and Davis will all make the final 53 man roster barring injuries, as they should.


Tyler McLellan is 6’8″, 355 – by the way, I think Tyler makes the team

I can’t see McLellan making it unless due to one or more serious injuries to others ahead of him.
I can’t see the Chargers keeping 10 OL, I think it will have to be 9 due to roster needs at other positions.
He would have to beat out James, Salyer, Taylor, or Pipkins. So which one of those guys do you see not making the roster in order for McLellan to make it?
As I have mentioned in the past, there is nothing to like about him as a NFL level player. His college experience was FCS, and his RAS is poor for everything other than size. Poor strength, poor agility, poor explosiveness, short arms.
I don’t believe he is capable of stepping into a heavy snaps role in the event of injuries and performing at close to an acceptable level.
It would be great if he proves me wrong, since that would imply a OL upgrade, but that would surprise me a lot.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Member
Reply to  Tau837
10 months ago

On the first round pick selection: It was pointed out that exercising Zion’s 5th year option would make Johnson one of the highest paid interion lineman

The cost of this option is determined by the average of the third to 25th highest salaries for that position in the last five seasons, and can be impacted by playing time and Pro Bowl selections. 

The NFL considers “offensive lineman" a position. Picking an interior lineman in the first round means the 5th year option is going to be expensive.

On QJ, you are likely right. He is most likely on the team. However, unless the dude learns how to catch the football, his playing time this year is going way down and his roster spot will be at risk this year and next (and he will be gone in 2027).

My point on the linemen is that the team values size and strength. Size does not always equal playing strength (Pipkins is big, but strength has never been one of his playing strengths). I thought McLellan looked great last pre-season. When he injured his knee, the team kept him on IR, which tells me they see something they want to invest in. I’m eager to see what he looks like after spending a year with Ben Herbert.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  KevDiego
10 months ago

 KevDiego Sorry, I may have misunderstood your original point on the 5th year option. I thought you were saying it would be unaffordable to pick up Hampton’s 5th year option, which makes the pick less attractive, and used Zion as an example. I don’t agree with that on Hampton.
As for Zion, per OTC his 5th year option would have projected to $17.56M. This year, that would rank as the #32 average salary among OL. Since it would  have been for next year, that number will presumably drop down in that ranking.
If Zion’s play had been commensurate with his draft pick, I don’t think there would have been a problem exercising his 5YO; they could have exercised it and then worked out a contract extension so they did not have to actually incur the 5YO cap hit in 2026. The issue with him and reason for not exercising it is his play, not the cap hit.
So I guess I’m not following the logic for why the 5YO should affect a first round draft pick decision.

Smith
Smith(@smith)
Reply to  KevDiego
10 months ago

 KevDiego Football aside, you hiring? I’m in a job pickle right now.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Member
Reply to  Smith
10 months ago

You in the Atlanta area?

Smith
Smith(@smith)
Reply to  KevDiego
10 months ago

 KevDiego Nope. But could be. Do you mind shooting me the company name and I’ll look you up.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Member
Reply to  Smith
10 months ago

We are a VERY small healthcare company that I’m trying to grow. We have very limited budgets. I end up doing a lot of shit because we don’t have funds to hire someone to do it.

We hopefully will have sufficient revenue to cover someone to help with leadership this fall. Right now, I need every available $ to hire & pay our (revenue generating) clinicians.

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Member
Reply to  TDU_Alister
11 months ago

 TDU_Alister again, unreadable.

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Member
Reply to  TDU_Alister
11 months ago

 TDU_Alister unfortunately the formatting of this (at least for me and I’m sure it’s site-driven) makes nearly all of this post unreadable.  🙁

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Member
Reply to  TDU_Alister
11 months ago

I can imagine it is! Lotta effort put into something that is nearly indecipherable through no fault of your own.

As an aside, I watched and enjoyed the latest TDU podcast. Agree with most of the takes. Based on a combination of the player and the draft value, I think I’m most excited about the potential of Kenard and Gadsden. That’s not to say I think they’ll be our most impactful picks overall. It’s more a gauge of my excitement to see what they may become.

I’m coming around on the Hampton pick. Wouldn’t have been my first choice but I get it based on fit and how the board fell. We may never know exactly what transpired regarding a trade down and I’m not big on what it’s. It’s show me time. And I must admit that I have some bias against UNC.

At least it wasn’t Green….lol.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
10 months ago

 TDU_Alister Alister, it reads fine for me. Formatting is fine.
I have found on this site, formatting is completely different in the forum than in the website where articles are posted. Formatting that is fine in the forum is completely different if you view it as a comment to an article. That’s why I view everything in the forum. I bet this is the problem Buck is having.

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Member
Reply to  Tau837
10 months ago

 Tau837 that’s absolutely it.
 
So I’ll often get 2 email notifications about a reply. One is generated by the forum, the other by the site.
Which link I follow apparently can affect formatting; i.e. site vs. forum.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Member
Reply to  TDU_Alister
10 months ago

I can read everything as well.

A great wealth of information. Chewed up way to much of my time.

UncleJammsArmy
UncleJammsArmy(@unclejammsarmy)
Member
Reply to  KevDiego
10 months ago

 KevDiego I can’t read a damn thing. Formatting is off for me.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
10 months ago

@alisterlloyd 


Effectively ran two routes at Ole Miss most of the time (47 of 79 targets were either Go or Hitch routes in 2024)

FWIW, here is the route percentage Matt Harmon showed for Harris (note that Harmon does not specify which games or how many games are in his sample):

Curl: 29.4%
Nine: 20.6%
Slant: 13.5%
Post: 11.5%
Dig: 10.7%
Screen: 8.0%
Corner: 3.6%
Out: 3.2%
Flat: 0.8%
Other: 0.8%
Comeback: 0.0%

Here was Harmon’s charted success rate by route:

Curl: 87.8%
Nine: 61.5%
Slant: 85.3%
Post: 55.2%
Dig: 66.7%
Screen: 100.0%
Corner: 44.4%
Out: 62.5%
Flat: 100.0%
Other: 50.0%
Comeback: N/A

Other data from his prospect profile:

He took 78.8% of his sampled snaps outside and was on the line of scrimmage for 54.9%.
Success rate vs. man coverage was 73.2%, which was 74th percentile
Success rate vs. zone coverage was 75.2%, which was only 24th percentile
Success rate vs. press coverage was 72.2%, which was 78th percentile

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
11 months ago

As for the closing Alister rant, I agree 100%. As much as I like Alt, I think they should have traded down last year if they could have. I think they should have traded down this year if they could have. And I’ll probably think the same thing next year and nearly every year.
Assuming the team gets at least the appropriate value based on draft charts, and further assuming the team drafts well, I think it is almost always going to be greater value to trade down.
That said, I think the biggest problem in this draft for me was taking Tre Harris over Mike Green. If Green is good enough for John Harbaugh and Hortiz’s former front office, I’m not sure why he isn’t good enough for Jim Harbaugh and Hortiz.
Meanwhile, it was obvious at the time that there would be good WR prospects available later. We know this from Lambert-Smith but also Royals, Horton, and others. That is a bigger process failure to me than taking Hampton.
Another minor negative for me was that they could have drafted C Majors, and I thought he was a nobrainer starting in the 6th round. I was disappointed they didn’t draft him.

UncleJammsArmy
UncleJammsArmy(@unclejammsarmy)
Member
Reply to  Tau837
11 months ago

 Tau837 I don’t think there’s any doubt that, based purely on talent, Mike Green should have been drafted at 22, and certainly 55. But his off-field issues clearly made him undraftable to the team.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
11 months ago

 TDU_Alister I get this. I just find it incredibly interesting that the Ravens drafted him. Hortiz came from that front office, and Jim is the brother of Ravens HC John Harbaugh. So it seems odd to me that one of those groups would be fine with Green and the other would not.
Having said that, I know nothing about the merits of the allegations and I am completely on board with passing on him if there is merit there.

Tui
Tui(@tui1hit)
Reply to  Tau837
10 months ago

 Tau837 I believe it’s a Spanos’ policy. This team has a history of avoiding players with questionable characters. I agree with Alister, and credit the Spanos for sticking their own gun when it come to decision over trouble players. For what he’s accused of is very grievous, but there teams such as Ravens, Chiefs, to name a few, like to take such players until they’re proven guilty. I’m glad I’m a Chargers fan.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Member
Reply to  Tau837
10 months ago

My daughters are 15 & 11, so I have a very low tolerance for serial sexual assaulters. I do think there’s a difference between a player like Matt Azera, who was accused once, denied everything from the beginning, was cleared by authorities, never charged, but still punish and Deshawn Watson, who has dozens of accusers and seems to be continuing to assault women (while still getting paid by the NFL).

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
11 months ago

I didn’t like the Lambert-Smith pick at the time. I was hoping for G Frazier there. When they traded up for Gadsden, I was sure they were trading up for Frazier.
Anyway, good discussion on Lambert-Smith. I found a short profile at Reception Perception, and it is encouraging overall. First, it identified this concern:

He is a skewed alignment receiver, as he took 77.4% of his snaps from the right outside spot. There’s usually a developmental curve for these players, if they even become contributors at all.

However, his overall assessment is positive:

Overall, KeAndre Lambert-Smith is far from a complete prospect but is someone I would love to get in my receiver room and see what happens. Anyone who shows the ability to win against man coverage, get open downfield and make difficult catches is worth exploring.

There was also an article at the Athletic that contained anonymous comments from NFL execs on other teams’ draft picks. Here is a very interesting excerpt:

Another exec liked the receiver the Chargers drafted in the fifth round (KeAndre Lambert-Smith) better than the receiver they took in the second round (Tre Harris).
“Quicker, faster, can close cushion on a DB and make him wet his pants,” this exec said. “He will turn into your starting Z and run by people.”

Overall, I have warmed up to the pick quite a bit.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
11 months ago

 TDU_Alister With regard to the skewed alignment, it is something Harmon refers to often over multiple years now. He clearly believes it is an impactful factor.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
11 months ago

Enjoyed the discussion on Caldwell and Kennard. Again, very thoughtful and well informed.
You guys speculated that Kennard would only play 8-10 snaps per game. That would be fairly disappointing if true, and could be an actual problem.
First off, in a year, both Mack and Dupree could be gone, and the team might need Kennard to play a lot more snaps than that, and I would hope for him to get more snaps in 2025 to prepare for that.
As for 2025, this was the breakdown of Edge defensive snaps last season:

Tuli: 774 in 18 games = 43.0 per game
Mack: 668 in 17 games = 39.3 per game
Bosa: 503 in 15 games = 33.5 per game
Dupree: 570 in 18 games = 31.7 per game
Total: 2,515 in 18 games = 139.7 per game

That is a lot of Bosa snaps to replace. 8-10 snaps per game for Kennard would be well under 200 snaps. Who in the Edge group would get the other 325+ snaps?
I would not expect Mack to play more snaps, and he could play fewer than last year. I suppose Tuli could play more, but how many more? He already led the group. I’m also not confident that the trio of Tuli, Mack, and Dupree will combine to miss just one game in 2025.
I think they will need a lot more than 8-10 snaps from Kennard. If he isn’t good enough to play 20+, then this wasn’t a great pick.
And this brings me back to my point on Tre Harris. For months leading up to the draft, I was saying I felt the team needed to get an Edge and IDL within the first 3 rounds of the draft. I was also saying I did not see WR as a prominent need.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
11 months ago

 TDU_Alister


Although all of the above needs to be read subject to the disclaimer that the team could add a starting Edge between now and September (eg, Trey Hendrickson via trade, or a post-June cut). The way they approached Edge in the Draft leads me to think that at least another veteran Edge will be added to the roster. I expect that player to be someone they view internally as being a better football player than Tuli but worse than Joey Bosa.

This is a very interesting thought. I have posted in multiple threads recently about the roster position decision pressure the Chargers will face. I cannot see them keeping 5 Edge players.
If they acquire a veteran Edge who is better than Tuli, the implication is that player will make the final roster. Well, Mack and Tuli are obviously going to make it. So adding a player of the caliber you suggest here implies they keep 5 Edge players or they do not keep either Kennard or Dupree… I assume Dupree in that scenario.
This seems fairly unlikely to me. Do you have any players in mind?

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
10 months ago

@alisterlloyd 
I get that thought. I am baffled as to what they are doing with their cap space.

Tui
Tui(@tui1hit)
Reply to  Tau837
10 months ago

 Tau837
I think Kennard will play more snaps than the projection. Minter had to have some saying in the selection of Kennard despite his struggle against the run and his inability to set the edge. But Minter likes to use three pass rushers with Tuli to kick inside. Now that Morgan Fox (DE) is no longer with the team and there is no starting DE on the roster, I tend to believe Tuli will play more inside as DE rusher while Kennard gets more snaps on the edge on passing downs.
“The way they approached Edge in the Draft leads me to think that at least another veteran Edge will be added to the roster. I expect that player to be someone they view internally as being a better football player than Tuli but worse than Joey Bosa.”
 An interesting take by Allister. Number one, Tuli is being grossly undervalued by this comment, if you it considers Bosa’s recent level of performance. Bosa at his prime was top 5 Edge in the league but he was not nearly the player he was three seasons ago. I just don’t see a veteran out there that fits Allister’s scenario, unless the team goes after Hendrickson (better than Bosa and everyone else at Edge on the current roster), but I’m doubtful the team would go after him unless he is released which is highly unlikely since the Bengals cannot afford to lose him.
We haven’t mentioned about Tuli’s special team snaps at 363, the second-leading special teamer behind only Troy Dye at 391 snaps. It’s quite astounding for player, a power rusher especially who plays starter level number of snaps to play that much of special team plays. It has to be very exhausting and to affect your energy level of play. Yet, Tuli in 9 starts, he recorded 42 tackles, 8.5 sacks (team most), and 11 tackles for loss. Give this kid rest and 17 starts, I’m confident he will be at pro-bowl level next season.   
 

UncleJammsArmy
UncleJammsArmy(@unclejammsarmy)
Member
11 months ago

Great pod Alister. Love the comedy (intended or otherwise) between you, Jack and Andy. But I thought you graded the class too harshly, even if I share my misgivings about drafting Hampton at 22. 

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
10 months ago

 TDU_Alister


Ravens GM Eric DaCosta spoke on a podcast yday about the only way to draft well reliably being to secure more ‘at bats’. I wish Hortiz followed the Ravens method a little more closely on Draft Night.

In fairness, Hortiz has made 18 picks in 2 drafts, an average of 9 per draft. Telesco made 76 picks in 11 drafts, so just a bit under 7 picks per draft. He only made 9 picks in a draft one time.

KevDiego
KevDiego(@kevdiego)
Member
Reply to  Tau837
10 months ago

I was thinking about this point the other day. If you have a 53 man roster and 16 player practice squad, you need a minimum of 69 players. Let’s say you need another 11 for in-season injuries (to help Kevin with math): That’s 80 players.

If you draft 7 players per year:

  • You will have a MAXIMUM of 29 drafted players on your roster on their rookie contracts
  • Through either FA, UDFA or giving second contracts to players, you will need to sign a minimum of 51 players per year, including 14 on the active roster
  • Cutting players before they finish their rookie contracts add more need for FA contracts

If you draft 10 players per year:

  • You will have a MAXIMUM of 41 drafted players on your roster under their rookie contracts
  • Through FA, UDFA or giving second contracts to drafted players, you will need to sign 39 more players per year, 12 to the active roster.

It’s clearly better to have more picks. The art in this endeavor is having the right mix of vet FAs and upcoming talent.

UncleJammsArmy
UncleJammsArmy(@unclejammsarmy)
Member
Reply to  TDU_Alister
10 months ago

 TDU_Alister I actually had Henderson as my RB2 and I know he would have been there at 32. I’m not high on Hampton for many reasons Jack (I think) mentioned. But I’m still on the B+ side of things on the grade, assuming Hampton pans out. Loved the Harris, Caldwell, KLS, Gadsden, and Mickey’s picks, but thought the team waited too long to draft OL.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
11 months ago

I thought your discussion about Harris was thoughtful and well presented.
I don’t love the pick. I am skeptical he will ever become a true NFL #1 WR. That is okay, because the Chargers have a #1 WR in McConkey. But I would rather draft more of a sure thing at 55 than I see in Harris.
Here is PFF’s bottom line on him:

Harris projects as an alluring WR3 type for an offense that likes to push the ball down the field. His route tree and separation rates leave something to be desired, but he can keep a defense honest with his field-stretching ability.

WR3 type…
Lance Zeuerlein projected him as a 3rd round pick and identified Alec Pierce as his NFL comparison. His overview:

Size/speed wideout who returned to school in 2024 and improved his game heading into this year’s draft. He’s primarily a first- and third-level target, mixing a barrage of hitches and slants with go routes and posts. He’s fast enough to win over the top and talented with the ball in his hands to stretch short throws into longer yardage. His route-running and contested-catch success both took an upturn but they still need work at the pro level. Of greater concern might be a second consecutive season of time missed due to injury. Harris might be capable of expanding his route tree a bit, but he looks locked in as an “X” receiver with big-game potential and a future home as a WR2.

Alec Pierce…
Dane Brugler had him projected as a round 2-3 player. From his overview:

Overall, Harris doesn’t have the explosive speed or separation skills that teams covet in a No. 1 receiver, but he is a controlled athlete with the play strength and ball skills to be a dependable possession target. He projects as an NFL starter and a team’s No. 2 target — if he can stay healthy.

#2 target…
Matt Harmon wrote these things in his prospect profile:

Harris doesn’t have a well-rounded route tree. It leans heavily into the vertical areas. A whopping 56% of his sampled routes were screens, curls or nines. This isn’t totally out of the ordinary for collegiate receivers coming from offenses like the one Lane Kiffin operates at Ole Miss but it could be something that limits his early-career contributions…
If we’re looking for comparisons, you could argue Brian Thomas is the peak of this archetype we’re highlighting for Tre Harris. Thomas is developing beyond this, in my opinion, and offers such a rare skill set that doesn’t align with this vertical X-receiver group.  Fellow Ole Miss alum DK Metcalf is probably the better example of the peak, and he and Harris have some similarities. Metcalf is just a more impressive specimen.
Colts receiver Alec Pierce was mentioned earlier and he’s probably one of the better sacrificial X-receivers around. Harris’ team will hope he can offer more consistent impact and there are some signs he can do it. If you’re looking for a cautionary comparison, there are some disturbing similarities between the Reception Perception profiles of Harris and former LSU prospect Terrace Marshall. Both guys boasted strong man coverage success rates, didn’t win at a satisfactory level against zone and boasted excellent scores on a limited handful of routes.
What a wide range we just went through! But this is a helpful exercise when investigating players along this branch of the X-receiver spectrum.

Spectrum from Thomas to Metcalf to Pierce to Marshall… quite a broad range of outcomes there.
I heard Sam Monson comment on the pick on the Check the Mic podcast. He noted how difficult it is to project WRs from offenses like the Ole Miss offense. He concluded his take by saying Harris has first round upside but with considerable risk.
Overall, I would have preferred Bech if the team wanted WR. But I really would have preferred another position, like Edge (Mike Green, Landon Jackson) or IDL (Omarr Norman-Lott, Darius Alexander).
But he is now presumably at least a 4 year player for the Chargers, so I will root for him to hit his ceiling in 2026 or beyond.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
11 months ago

Watched the show today. Great show.
Generally agree with the discussion on Hampton. I wrote an assessment after the pick in this thread.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
10 months ago

@alisterlloyd 
In listening to the Check the Mic podcast review of AFC West drafts, Sam Monson said he was once completely against drafting a RB in the first round, but he has come around to believing it is okay if you can answer yes to three questions:
1. Is the team prepared to immediately support an elite RB in a manner to make him successful?
The example given was the Giants taking Barkley when they weren’t ready, and consequently, Barkley’s years with the Giants were wasted in the sense that his play was unable to really elevate the offense and team.
2. Are you okay with the opportunity cost of leaving other availaable players on the board to draft RB?
3. Are you okay with paying the RB what drafting him here requires?
This gets at the “surplus value" argument. The Raiders drafting Jeanty makes him the 13th highest paid RB, whereas drafting another position would have meant that player would rank much lower in that position’s salary ranking, arguably making that other player a better value. For the record, I don’t really agree with this argument.
Monson said he thought it was very close, but he could understand answering yes to all 3 questions for Jeanty. But he said his answer to #2 for Hampton would have been no, so he did not think Hampton was a good pick.
He didn’t say who he would have drafted instead but went on to say his reasoning amounted to believing waiting and drafting a RB later would have been better draft strategy, given that RB was so deep.

Tau837
Tau837(@tau837)
Reply to  TDU_Alister
10 months ago

 TDU_Alister


Why don’t you like the surplus value argument again?

Because it is much more complicated IMO.
IMO it is misguided because it generally isolates cap hits from actual play on the field and the associated impact on performance. It assumes that market positional value accurately represents value to the team that drafts the player, applying equally and accurately to all players at a given position regardless of the context of their team (e.g., offensive/defensive scheme/philosophy).
If the Chargers draft a rookie at 22, they are going to pay what the rookie cap dictates. It doesn’t truly matter if that means they pay Hampton or another player. That player will make that amount.
IMO the better way to look at it is player combinations. For example, what is better for the Chargers in 2025?

Option 1 (what they did):

Draft Hampton
Reduce snaps for Harris in 2025
Get assumed lesser play at the position they did not draft (i.e., whoever their alternative choice would have been at 22)
Plus addiiional ripple effects on draft and post-draft free agency resulting from different picks

Option 2:

Draft another position in first round and presumably upgrade play at that position
Use Harris as more of a lead RB in 2025
Draft complementary RB later in the draft (and don’t get whatever player they actually drafted there)
Plus addiiional ripple effects on draft and post-draft free agency resulting from different picks

Now extend the question beyond 2025 to the next 4-5 years, since every roster consists of players from several draft classes.
It obviously gets very subjective, and IMO defies trying to put the answer into a neat analytical box.