OL
Roster Construction

The Guard Spot Isn’t Broken.
It’s On Brand.

The Chargers’ guard room looks like a problem if you squint at the PFF grades in isolation. But across five years of Mike McDaniel offensive lines, a 54-graded guard isn’t a weakness. It’s the baseline. And the data says this roster is built to draft BPA, not fill a hole that doesn’t actually exist.

The “Problem” Everyone Wants to Solve

If you’ve been plugged into any Chargers draft coverage this spring, you’ve heard the refrain: the guard spots need to be addressed. Cole Strange graded out at 54.9 for the season in Miami. Trevor Penning posted a 53.6 in his first year at guard. Those numbers look ugly in a vacuum, and the natural instinct is to treat the position as a Day 1 or Day 2 draft priority.

I get it… when you see two projected starters grading in the low-to-mid 50s, it feels like a fire that needs to be put out with premium capital.

But here’s the thing: that instinct is based on an assumption that doesn’t hold up when you actually look at how Mike McDaniel’s offensive lines have been built over the past five years. The guard room isn’t broken. It’s operating exactly within the range that McDaniel has not only tolerated but schemed around for his entire tenure as an OC and head coach.

And once you understand that, the entire draft calculus shifts.

McDaniel Has Never Had Two Good Guards

This isn’t hyperbole. Across five seasons calling plays (2021 San Francisco as OC, 2022 through 2025 Miami as HC), Mike McDaniel has never once fielded an offensive line where both guard spots graded above 60.0 per PFF. Not once.

Let that sit for a second. The guy fans hammered the table for because of his ingenuity and genius as an offensive guru has produced top-ten offenses in multiple seasons despite consistently weak guard play. Robert Hunt was a bright spot when healthy, but he was always paired with a liability on the other side. In 2023, the Dolphins ranked top-three in yards per play leaguewide. And in every single one of those seasons, at least one guard was grading below 57, and usually one was below 47.

The scheme is designed for this. Motion, misdirection, quick-game passing, combo blocking schemes. McDaniel’s entire offensive architecture is built to protect interior weaknesses by moving the point of attack away from stationary one-on-one matchups. When your guard is a 40-grade player, you don’t ask him to anchor against a 90-grade interior rusher. You make sure that rusher is wrong about where the play is going before he ever gets there.

Here’s how every McDaniel OL stacks up, ranked by the average PFF blocking grade of the starting five (determined by snap count):

# Year / Unit Top 3 Bot 2 Gap Full 5 Range
1 2021 SF (OC) 83.4 64.3 19.0 75.8
2026 LAC Scenario A PROJ 80.2 54.2 26.0 69.8
2 2024 MIA (HC Yr 3) 74.7 54.6 20.1 66.7
3 2022 MIA (HC Yr 1) 76.1 52.4 23.8 66.6
2026 LAC Scenario B PROJ 70.8 54.2 16.6 64.2
4 2023 MIA (HC Yr 2) 69.2 45.8 23.4 59.8
5 2025 MIA (HC Yr 4) 71.4 41.7 29.8 59.5

Bot 2 Avg    Top 3 Avg    Full 5 Avg

Look at that bottom-2 column. Scenario A’s 54.2 average at the guard spots is better than or equal to what McDaniel worked with in four of his five seasons. Only the 2021 49ers (64.3) and 2024 Dolphins (54.6) had a stronger bottom pair. The 2025 Dolphins, his most recent team, ran it back with a bottom-2 average of 41.7. That included Jonah Savaiinaea at 28.4, the single worst starting offensive lineman grade of McDaniel’s entire career.

Strange and Penning at 54? That’s not a glaring hole that demands a Day 1 or 2 guard to be drafted. It’s Mike McDaniel’s brand. If a guard is BPA in any of the Chargers’ early picks it would no doubt be a solid selection, but Hortiz won’t have a knee-jerk reaction to draft a guard early knowing McDaniel’s history.

The Top of the Line Is What Matters

McDaniel’s best offensive lines weren’t defined by five solid starters working in harmony. They were defined by elite left tackle play, a good-to-great center, and a serviceable right tackle.

The success of the 49ers and Dolphins was tied directly to Trent Williams and Terron Armstead’s availability, and it’s no surprise that the Dolphins unraveled in the first year of Armstead’s retirement. In both cases, the top-end talent created enough surplus to compensate for significant weaknesses elsewhere.

The 2026 Chargers’ projected top three is Rashawn Slater (90.9), Joe Alt (79.0), and Tyler Biadasz (70.7). That’s an average of 80.2, the best trio McDaniel has had since his San Francisco days, with the potential to surpass even that elite unit.

Slater and Alt together represent something McDaniel has never had: two elite bookend tackles on the same roster. The Chargers give him two franchise tackles, both under 27, both under contract long-term. That changes the entire equation.

The Yearly Breakdown

2021 San Francisco 49ers (OC) • Top 3: 83.4 • Full 5: 75.8
PosPlayerSnapsGradeTier
LTTrent Williams1,10596.6Top 3
RTTom Compton74379.9Top 3
LGLaken Tomlinson1,26473.6Top 3
CAlex Mack1,25871.6Bot 2
RGDaniel Brunskill1,25957.1Bot 2
2022 Miami Dolphins (HC Yr 1) • Top 3: 76.1 • Full 5: 66.6
PosPlayerSnapsGradeTier
CConnor Williams1,12778.4Top 3
LTTerron Armstead75377.6Top 3
RGRobert Hunt1,12672.3Top 3
RTBrandon Shell76164.9Bot 2
LGLiam Eichenberg62739.8Bot 2
2023 Miami Dolphins (HC Yr 2) • Top 3: 69.2 • Full 5: 59.8
PosPlayerSnapsGradeTier
RGRobert Hunt60876.4Top 3
RTAustin Jackson1,05066.9Top 3
LTKendall Lamm61364.3Top 3
LGLester Cotton61646.4Bot 2
CLiam Eichenberg87645.2Bot 2
2024 Miami Dolphins (HC Yr 3) • Top 3: 74.7 • Full 5: 66.7
PosPlayerSnapsGradeTier
LTTerron Armstead82189.4Top 3
CAaron Brewer1,13974.8Top 3
RTAustin Jackson54260.0Top 3
LGRobert Jones1,08056.1Bot 2
RGLiam Eichenberg1,03753.1Bot 2
2025 Miami Dolphins (HC Yr 4) • Top 3: 71.4 • Full 5: 59.5
PosPlayerSnapsGradeTier
CAaron Brewer91287.4Top 3
LTPatrick Paul97566.2Top 3
RTLarry Borom66460.7Top 3
RGCole Strange80854.9Bot 2
LGJonah Savaiinaea98228.4Bot 2

Cole Strange’s Grade Needs Context

Strange’s 54.9 full-season PFF grade in Miami is the number everyone will cite as evidence that the Chargers need a guard upgrade. But the full picture tells a much more nuanced story.

Strange was an in-season signing in Miami. He wasn’t there for OTAs. He didn’t get a training camp in McDaniel’s system. He was thrust into a starting role and asked to learn one of the NFL’s more complex blocking schemes on the fly, in real time, during live games.

But the back half of his season looked meaningfully different. Over his final seven games, Strange was averaging PFF grades of 64.5. That’s not a projection or a hope. That’s what happened once he had enough reps in the system to stop thinking and start playing.

The In-Season Signing Discount

PFF’s full-season grades don’t weight for scheme familiarity. A player learning the system in Weeks 1 through 7 and performing well in Weeks 8 through 17 gets a blended number that understates where he actually is. The late-season sample is the better predictor.

The McDaniel Center Effect

If there’s one pattern in McDaniel’s coaching history that should have the Chargers excited, it’s what happens to centers in his system.

Center Before McDaniel Year 1 Year 2 Jump
Connor Williams Career guard (DAL) 78.4 86.5 (partial) +8.1
Aaron Brewer Sub-60 grades (TEN) 74.8 87.4 +12.6
Tyler Biadasz 70.7 (WAS) TBD TBD Highest baseline yet

Connor Williams was a career guard in Dallas before McDaniel converted him to center. He posted a 78.4 in Year 1 and was on pace for 86.5 before a torn ACL ended his 2023 season. Aaron Brewer had never graded above 60 in Tennessee. Under McDaniel, he hit 74.8 in Year 1 and then exploded to 87.4 in Year 2, becoming one of the best centers in football.

Biadasz enters at a higher baseline than either Williams or Brewer had before joining McDaniel. But the more compelling case for his upside isn’t just the number. His flashes in Washington centered around elite movement skills when pulling or working out in space, which is a primary function of a McDaniel center. That skill set gives him the potential to take the biggest leap of the three, something that could vault this offensive line into one of the best units in the league.

This is the biggest variable in the entire projection. Not the guards. The center.

Even the Backup Plan Isn’t a Problem

Whether Slater makes it all the way back from his patellar tendon tear or needs additional recovery time, the contingency plan still holds up. If it’s Joe Alt at left tackle with Trey Pipkins at right tackle, the line still looks like a McDaniel offensive line.

Pipkins at Tackle (Guard Year Excluded)

Year Pos Snaps Grade Pass Block Run Block
2020 RT 571 54.8 50.3 59.1
2022 RT 968 59.8 65.4 50.5
2023 RT 1,116 62.8 67.3 50.3
2025 RT 666 49.9 60.7 43.8

Scenario B produces a full-unit average of 64.2, right in line with the 2022 and 2024 Dolphins units that averaged 66.6 and 66.7 respectively.

2026 Chargers Scenario B • Top 3: 70.8 • Full 5: 64.2
PosPlayerGradeTier
LTJoe Alt79.0Top 3
CTyler Biadasz70.7Top 3
RTTrey Pipkins III62.8Top 3
LGCole Strange54.9Bot 2
RGTrevor Penning53.6Bot 2
Top 3 Avg: 70.8Bot 2 Avg: 54.2Full 5: 64.2

The gap between Scenario A and Scenario B is entirely one player: swapping an elite Rashawn Slater with Trey Pipkins. That 28-point swing is enormous. But even the downside scenario produces an OL on par with McDaniel’s typical units, with Joe Alt as the elite LT anchor and Trey Pipkins as a serviceable zone-blocking right tackle. And the upside, McDaniel having both Slater and Alt at his disposal, is what gives this line a chance to be truly special.

BPA in Rounds 1 and 2. That’s the Luxury.

The Chargers don’t have a position group so broken it demands a specific pick with premium capital. That means Rounds 1 and 2 are genuinely open. If the best player available at 22 is a defensive tackle, take him. You aren’t forced into reaching for a guard at a price point that doesn’t match the return.

And here’s something worth considering: while fans may feel anxious about the guard situation, McDaniel might have his eyes on something else entirely. Despite the narrative that he built his Miami offense around the weapons already on the roster, that claim doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. The only wide receiver McDaniel carried over from the previous regime was Jaylen Waddle. He aggressively acquired new, explosive talent: a blockbuster trade for Tyreek Hill, and a series of draft picks spent on speedster skill players like De’Von Achane, Jaylen Wright, and Malik Washington. McDaniel doesn’t inherit an offense. He builds one around elite athletes. Don’t be surprised if, while fans are clamoring for a guard, McDaniel is actually eyeing another elite athlete to plug into his offense.

Round 3: Protect the Center, Not the Guard Spot

If a scheme-fit center is available in Round 3, that’s the smarter play than a guard.

The 2023 Case Study

In Week 14 of the 2023 season, Connor Williams tore his ACL. Over the final three regular season games without him, Miami scored 22, 19, and 14 points before managing just 7 in a wild card loss, 26-7. McDaniel’s scheme can absorb a weak guard. It cannot absorb a center who doesn’t command the blocking assignments, identify the fronts, and execute the combination blocks the entire system runs through.

The 2023 Dolphins were 7-2 in games Williams started and 4-5 in games he didn’t. That split isn’t a coincidence. It’s the clearest evidence in McDaniel’s entire tenure of how central the center position is to everything his offense does.

Sam Hecht and Logan Jones

Both project as strong scheme fits. Either one gives you catastrophic-loss prevention, which is more valuable than a marginal guard upgrade the scheme already compensates for. And unlike drafting a guard who creates a camp battle with Trevor Penning or Cole Strange, a center pick adds genuine depth at the one position you cannot afford to lose.

The Guard Spot Is Fine. Protect the Center.

Guard play in the low-to-mid 50s is normal for this system. The scheme absorbs it. Biadasz gives McDaniel the highest-ceiling center he’s ever inherited. Slater and Alt give him the best tackle pair he’s ever had. The move that protects all of that upside isn’t a guard upgrade… it’s adding insurance against an injury to Tyler Biadasz to make sure the pillars of the offensive line remain intact, the same way the team prioritized insurance at the tackle position by retaining Trey Pipkins.

Reasonable people can disagree on PFF grades versus scheme fit versus developmental upside. So I’ll ask directly: if Hecht or Jones is there in Round 3, and so is a guard who might start immediately, which way are you going? Let me know, StormCloud.

KD
STORMCLOUD STAFF
Kyle DeDiminicantanio
The Armchair GM
View All Articles →
14 Comments
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Blue Beers
Blue Beers(@blue-beers)
Member
2 months ago

Chargers just signed another backup G. Kayode Awosika, backup with the Lions the last few years.

Blue Beers
Blue Beers(@blue-beers)
Member
2 months ago

Reasonable people can disagree on PFF grades versus scheme fit versus developmental upside. So I’ll ask directly: if Hecht or Jones is there in Round 3, and so is a guard who might start immediately, which way are you going? Let me know, StormCloud.

Good question. I would say just take the best player? They can’t roll into the season without a backup C so they must have some plan. As I said earlier, I wonder if they’re targeting someone they think would have versatility like Miller, Parker or even Fano.

Erick V
Erick V(@erick-v)
Member
2 months ago

First off, I must say this article is fantastic. This is the type of critical analysis and statistics that every fan should be signing into Stormcloud for. You have pointed a light at the possible reasoning behind the IOL construction to this point, but lights can cast great shadows that necessarily didn’t have to be as large.

I fully understand that McDaniel’s scheme has worked with lesser talent at OG, but it doesn’t have to. We are not capped strapped. They could have operated higher in the FA market, but instead chose to sign replacement level players as starters and have still left open positions to fill in the reserves, and the top FA options have all been signed away. I think the process they have used is extremely flawed.

They gave Strange a 2yr 13M deal w/ 9M guaranteed to a guy who was on the street to start last season and would most likely not have garnered that price tag from any other team, and also wiped out a comp pick no less. He would probably still be unsigned.They signed Penning to 1yr/4.5M. Use the scheme narrative all you want, he’s a replacement level player at best, yet we have him penciled in as the starter.They let Elgton Jenkins sign elsewhere without even reaching out. He could have given you better OG play as well as becoming the backup C, and he didn’t factor into the comp formula.Resigned Pipkins to 2yr/10M when he has been a bad player but let Slayer walk to the tune of 1yr/1.4M who was the better player for us. Was anyone else giving Pipkins 10M? This contract also canceled out a possible outgoing FA contract that could have gained us a comp pick.They are banking on both tackles returning to form after Slater suffered an injury that is no guarantee to even be serviceable again, no less a premium player, and Joe Alt did, according to him, “everything possible you could do to an ankle” which forced him to IR pretty much most of the season. There is no guarantee what their level of play will be upon returning. If they do not come back as strong, then having below par OG are going to look even more glaring, but again they didn’t need to operate this way.For the obsession with comp picks, this FA spending has only netted us a 4th, which is not even going to be a top 100 pick. If they are eschewing to bring in the best talent possible for comp picks, they better be drafting Pro Bowlers in the 4th round. So far the 4th Rd picks have been Justin Eboigbe and Kyle Kennard. Is this level of player worth the penny pinching on established NFL players in FA?If the plan is to supplement in FA and not overspend, because they want to draft and develop, that is sound, but so far the drafting at OL has been Alt and Taylor, so there’s no credence to that theory. If they ignored adding to the unit in previous drafts that had extra picks, then they have no choice but to spend in FA. In fact, Hortiz had to burn picks to bring in an Edge and OL to make the units serviceable last year, because he refused to address it previously placing us in the position of still needing to adequately address those positions now with less draft capital.I like the Kolar signing, but from everything I have read they are describing him as the best blocking TE signing. If the plan to use him as primarily a blocker, was that worth 3yr/24M and factoring against the comp formula when Jenkins signed for 2yr/24M and didn’t factor? I think he can be used in a bigger receiving role, which could change the math, so we essentially signed him to be a “breakout” player in this scheme. Not saying it can’t happen, but until it does, the contract seems pretty steep for a blocker.If the belief is that McDaniel will be here for one year, isn’t it risky tailoring the roster to be in the same spot next year or even worse by having lesser talented, scheme specific players without the scheme?How can we believe the Harbaugh mantra of “offensive linemen are weapons” or “offensive line is the tip of the spear” or “every other position on offense can’t work without the offensive line” when he has done little to nothing to improve it since he’s been the HC?They watched the IOL crumble in Houston and got the franchise QB destroyed and their solution was to bring back Zion and Bozeman with no competition and after the best OG were gone in FA, sign an oft-injured OT convert in Becton. Looking back, if Howie Roseman let him walk, that should have been a red flag.They watched the IOL play get Herbert mauled all season and in the playoff game in NE. The answer so far was the OL on paper today.I am not saying all the signings were bad. Ingold, Mack, Mitchell, Tomlinson, Biadasz, TJ, Leonard, Harris, and Phillips were good calls.

I also do not believe the roster is so sound throughout that it is a total BPA approach in the first 2 rounds of the draft. If anything, there are glaring holes at Edge, IOL and to a lesser extent, DT that need to be addressed, and there is some thought that WR also needs some juice. With the way the roster is constructed now, I think it is more of a need based draft unless they plan on mining the UDFA route for the roster holes or trading for more picks. Whether we get more picks or not, what evidence is there that they will be spent on OL? They have yet to prioritize it outside of the Alt pick in 2024.

This is year 3 of this regime and you could argue that there are more questions about the roster construction than there should be at this point. Is the roster substantially better than we were in year 1 or 2? Shouldn’t that be the case? Have they done enough to build around there franchise QB and protect him? Is the obsession with the comp formula truly preventing the “all in” moves? Are we operating like an organization that believes it is in a Super Bowl window?

Fingers crossed it all works out, but if Herbert gets annihilated again this season because of OL play and God forbid lands on IR tanking the season, let’s remember that was the “scheme doesn’t need talent” plan this organization sold us in March and April. But they didn’t have to.

Last edited 2 months ago by Erick V
TDU_Alister
TDU_Alister(@alisterlloyd)
Reply to  Erick V
2 months ago

This really is one of your better posts, Erick.
I can feel the fire you’ve expelled warming my hands as I read it!
A very well-constructed polemic.

Last edited 2 months ago by TDU_Alister
Erick V
Erick V(@evolz3737)
Member
Reply to  TDU_Alister
2 months ago

Thanks Al. Appreciate it. I used bullet points for most of the article but it just posted it as one main paragraph which is annoying. Sorry for the massive wall of text but at least my skepticism of roster building came through.

Blue Beers
Blue Beers(@blue-beers)
Member
2 months ago

I appreciate the info you put together here and the case is compelling. I’ve been saying as all offseason without the PFF data. That said, I think part of what is going on here is that fans like us put way more stock into PFF grades than the teams do. I would bet A LOT of money that McDaniels doesn’t feel his guards are as mediocre to utter failures the way PFF grades them to be. Are they studs? Obviously not, but I’d bet their internal team grades were significantly higher. Or maybe PFF just doesn’t know how to grade guys in this system based on their actual responsibilities. Whatever it is, this is exactly why no one should craft an entire argument about players successes or failures based on PFF grades. Its just a massive fallacy to begin with.

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Member
Reply to  Blue Beers
2 months ago

I don’t put all that much emphasis on PFF grades and especially not for offensive linemen. It’s a tool but like any tool doesn’t work for every application.

Last edited 2 months ago by Buck Melanoma
TDU_Alister
TDU_Alister(@alisterlloyd)
2 months ago

Great stuff, Kyle.

What’s really interesting here is the common refrain from podcasts like Move The Sticks is that your bottom 2 on the OL are more important to your success (or lack thereof) than your Top 3.

And as Money likes to say on Chargers Weekly, if an opposing DC identifies that your line has one “Waldo”, he is going to attack that gap relentlessly. So on that view, having 5 average players is better than 3 elite ones + 2 liabilities.

It would seem that some of McDaniel’s historical offensive output rebuts the conventional wisdom, although MTS might retort that McDaniel’s teams didn’t make the playoffs consistently, and in those big playoff games, an elite 3-tech is liable to exploit your IOL deficiencies and ruin the game. We’ve certainly seen that occur for the Chargers.

If this is truly Hortiz and McDaniel’s strategy, we’re going to get to another data point to challenge the conventional thinking!

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Member
Reply to  Kyle DeDiminicantanio
2 months ago

Great article, Kyle. I’m still very nervous about the IOL but you’ve made a compelling argument here. I still hope that Iaone makes it to 1.22 but, after looking at the argument you’ve made here, I have to ask myself if he’d add as much immediate value as one of the edges or the TE Sadiq.

BPA is a great place to be in the draft. IMO, you can almost never be at a pure, 100% BPA spot. There’s always some need but when it doesn’t drive your decisions? That’s when you can add elite athletes who raise the overall performance of your roster. The playmaker and difference makers.

Like you, I certainly won’t be disappointed if an Iaone falls to 1.22 and he’s the pick. I’d be far more disappointed if he’s there and we passed! But I’ll also be disappointed with a reach and there’s honestly not a wealth of 1st round draft talent this year. Edge probably has the most with CB second.

Thanks again for allaying my OL angst at least a bit.

Please excuse any typos. This dark blue font on blue background while composing is really hard for me to see.

Buck Melanoma
Buck Melanoma(@buck-melanoma)
Member
Reply to  Kyle DeDiminicantanio
2 months ago

No worries man. Good luck with the listing.

Blue Beers
Blue Beers(@blue-beers)
Member
Reply to  Kyle DeDiminicantanio
2 months ago

I still feel fairly certain that they will draft an IOL player in the first few rounds. Will be very interesting to see if its a pure C or G or maybe they look to someone like Blake Miller or Brian Parker who have played T but could be moved inside and have the versatility to play anywhere.

In any case, I don’t think the Chargers necessarily want to roll out with a weak LG, I just don’t think they wanted to spend a ton of money on one in free agency. Spending huge dollars on IOL in free agency has more often than not been a fools errand in the NFL over the last 10 – 20 years. Its much better to draft a guard, develop in YOUR system and then pay that guy if you’re going to spend money on the position.